Message Number: 503
From: "Mark A. Sibert" <marksibert Æ gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:30:46 -0400
Subject: Re: [InlineNC] helmet usage
------=_Part_34418_22143278.1158953446490
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Thanks for sending that link.  I am definitely an advocate of helmets,
depsite being the one that posted the link you're referring to...  I think
the point of the original article was that you *might* be a little less
likely to get in an accident if you're not wearing a helmet, since the
drivers seemed to give more room when passing.	It certainly did not address
the issue that if you got in an accident, you're more likely to be seriously
injured or killed without a helmet.

As a simplistic example, let's say that if you're wearing a helmet, you have
a 25% chance of getting in an accident, as opposed to 10% without a helmet.
(I'm making these numbers up.)	And we'll say that, if in an accident, the
chance of brain damage or death is 50% without a helmet, but 10% with.	So,
combining the probabilities, we have 2.5% chance of brain damage or death
with a helmet, but 5% chance with -- twice as likely according to these
probabilities that I pulled out of by backside!  (If someone has real
numbers to use here, that would be really interesting to see!)

I skated for 10 years (recreationally) without a helmet before I had an
epiphany and realized how stupid it was.  Roadrash and broken bones can
heal, but a broken brain is an entirely different problem!

Of course, there is the website http://www.cyclehelmets.org/ that refutes
the need for helmets when cycling.  I wonder if there are any statistics on
overall helmet usage to go with the report you linked to.  For example, the
statistic about 97% of fatalities involving someone not wearing a helmet
could be a bit skewed if the vast majority of cyclists don't wear helmets.

Anyway, this is all great info...  It amazes me when I'm skating on the
bikepath and I see other skaters wearing every piece of protective gear ever
invented -- except a helmet!  Not *that's* crazy no matter how you look at
it!

I'd like to post your email (and this one) as a follow-up to the original
blog entry on rsn2, if that's okay with you...	That way, the information is
there, and search-able for anyone that might stumble onto it.

And, hey, at least being a woman the article says you're less likely to get
hit too -- so you'e got that going for you!  (Although maybe it doesn't
apply for skaters...)

- Mark


On 9/22/06, bethany soule   wrote:
>
>   I wanted to send out a counter argument to this article claiming that
> cycling (and we can probably infer skating too, though I guess drivers
> are often so surprised to see you on the road, they're likely to give
> you a pretty wide berth) with a helmet is actually "more dangerous":
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/somerset/5334208.stm
>
> Check out this report from the NYC DOT on bicycle accidents in the
> city over the past 10 years. Of 225 fatalities, 97% of the riders were
> not wearing helmets, and 74% involved a head injury. Drivers may be
> more reckless around you if you're wearing a helmet (because you look
> more competent or something) -- but you're still at a much higher risk
> of serious injury and death without the helmet.
> www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/episrv/episrv-bike-report.pdf
>
> (One could also conclude from the nycdot's data that nyc is actually a
> pretty safe place to bike comparatively. The accident rate per million
> is the same as 'elsewhere' in the country, while there are twice as
> many cyclists per million out there. (#2 under the 'key findings'
> section))
>
> Bethany
>  __._,_.___  Messages in this topic
>  (
> 1)  Reply (via web post)
>  | Start
> a new topic
>  
>  Messages 
>  InlineNC.net * InlineNC-subscribe Æ yahoogroups.com
>  [image: Yahoo! Groups] 
> Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
> Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch
> format to Traditional 
>  Visit Your Group
>  | Yahoo!
> Groups Terms of Use	| Unsubscribe
>  
>   Recent Activity
>
>    -	1
>    New Members 
>
>  Visit Your Group
>  
> SPONSORED LINKS
>
>    - High point 
>    - Inline skating 
>    - Aggressive inline skating 
>    - Inline skating equipment 
>
>   Ads on Yahoo!
>
> Learn more now. 
>
> Reach customers
>
> searching for you.
>  Y! Toolbar
>
> Get it Free! 
>
> easy 1-click access
>
> to your groups.
>  Yahoo! Groups
>
> Start a group 
>
> in 3 easy steps.
>
> Connect with others.
>   .
>
> __,_._,___
>

------=_Part_34418_22143278.1158953446490
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Thanks for sending that link.  I am definitely an advocate of helmets, depsite
being the one that posted the link you're referring to...  I think the point of
the original article was that you *might* be a little less likely to get in an
accident if you're not wearing a helmet, since the drivers seemed to give more
room when passing.  It certainly did not address the issue that if you got in
an accident, you're more likely to be seriously injured or killed without a
helmet.
  As a simplistic example, let's say that if you're wearing a helmet, you have
a 25% chance of getting in an accident, as opposed to 10% without a helmet. 
(I'm making these numbers up.)	And we'll say that, if in an accident, the
chance of brain damage or death is 50% without a helmet, but 10% with.	So,
combining the probabilities, we have 
2.5% chance of brain damage or death with a helmet, but 5% chance with -- twice
as likely according to these probabilities that I pulled out of by backside! 
(If someone has real numbers to use here, that would be really interesting to
see!)
  I skated for 10 years (recreationally) without a helmet before I had an
epiphany and realized how stupid it was.  Roadrash and broken bones can heal,
but a broken brain is an entirely different problem!  Of course, there is the
website 
 http://www.cyclehelmets.org/  that refutes the need for helmets when cycling. 
I wonder if there are any statistics on overall helmet usage to go with the
report you linked to.  For example, the statistic about 97% of fatalities
involving someone not wearing a helmet could be a bit skewed if the vast
majority of cyclists don't wear helmets.  
  Anyway, this is all great info...  It amazes me when I'm skating on the
bikepath and I see other skaters wearing every piece of protective gear ever
invented -- except a helmet!  Not *that's* crazy no matter how you look at it!
  I'd like to post your email (and this one) as a follow-up to the original
blog entry on rsn2, if that's okay with you...	That way, the information is
there, and search-able for anyone that might stumble onto it. 
 And, hey, at least being a woman the article says you're less likely to get
hit too -- so you'e got that going for you!  (Although maybe it doesn't apply
for skaters...)    - Mark     
On 9/22/06,  bethany soule  < bsoule Æ gmail.com > wrote:  









 


 
   


     
	     I wanted to send out a counter argument to this article claiming
that 
cycling (and we can probably infer skating too, though I guess drivers 
are often so surprised to see you on the road, they're likely to give 
you a pretty wide berth) with a helmet is actually "more dangerous": 
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/somerset/5334208.stm  
 
Check out this report from the NYC DOT on bicycle accidents in the 
city over the past 10 years. Of 225 fatalities, 97% of the riders were 
not wearing helmets, and 74% involved a head injury. Drivers may be 
more reckless around you if you're wearing a helmet (because you look 
more competent or something) -- but you're still at a much higher risk 
of serious injury and death without the helmet. 
 www.nyc.gov/ html/doh/downloads/pdf/episrv/episrv-bike-report.pdf 
 
(One could also conclude from the nycdot's data that nyc is actually a 
pretty safe place to bike comparatively. The accident rate per million 
is the same as 'elsewhere' in the country, while there are twice as 
many cyclists per million out there. (#2 under the 'key findings' 
section)) 
 
Bethany 
 
       

    
     __._,_.___ 
    
     
	       
	   

	    Messages in this topic	      ( 1 )
	 
	 

	   
	    Reply	     (via web post)
	   | 
	 

	  Start a new topic	    
	    
    
    
     
		 
Messages   
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
       
    

    
     
	      


	InlineNC.net *	InlineNC-subscribe Æ yahoogroups.com	  


	   

    
    
     
       

	  
       
Change settings via the Web  (Yahoo! ID required)  
      Change settings via email:  Switch delivery to Daily Digest  | 
 Switch format to Traditional	

       

	Visit Your Group 
	|
       
	Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use	  |
       
	Unsubscribe	   
	  
    

  
  
  
   

    
    
    
     
	       Recent Activity 
	 
		 
	  1 
	
New Members  
     
  
	    
	    
	    
	    
	    
	 
	     

	Visit Your Group       
      
		 SPONSORED LINKS 
       
	 
		      
High point  
		      
Inline skating	
		      
Aggressive inline skating  
		      
Inline skating equipment  
		   
       
    
    
		 
	       
		       Ads on Yahoo!  
  
Learn more now.   
 Reach customers  
 searching for you.		       
		     
			 Y! Toolbar 
    
Get it Free!  
   easy 1-click access 
   to your groups. 
		   
		     
			 Yahoo! Groups 
    
Start a group  
   in 3 easy steps. 
   Connect with others. 
		   
	   
      
      
   . 
     
 __,_._,___ 

 








   

------=_Part_34418_22143278.1158953446490--