| Message Number: | 825 |
| From: | Daniel Reeves <dreeves Æ umich.edu> |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:36:17 -0400 (EDT) |
| Subject: | Re: Good article (religion vs science) |
Thanks Uluc. In related news, I'm no longer an atheist. Sam Harris just changed my mind about this. Or perhaps put into words a conclusion I gradually came to over the past couple years: http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris/2007/10/the_prob... atheism.html This reminds me of Steve Levitt's bewilderment at the recent spate of anti-God books (Dennett, Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris, Paulos, Stenger) [1]. It's like writing a book called "Why Bird-Watching is a Waste of Time". Who would buy that book? It's not going to dissuade bird watchers and everyone else already agrees and doesn't need to read a book about it! (I think Levitt is wrong but I found that hilarious.) Danny [1] By the way, all of those authors (except Stenger; he sounds good too, from reviews, but I don't know first-hand) are brilliant and really fun to read. > http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_60/iss_8/49_1.shtml > > It is titled "Science and the Islamic worldThe quest for rapprochement" by > Pervez Amirali Hoodbhoy in the department of physics at Quaid-i-Azam > University in Islamabad, Pakistan. -- http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" A computer, to print out a fact, Will divide, multiply, and subtract. But this output can be No more than debris, If the input was short of exact. -- Gigo

