| Message Number: | 747 |
| From: | Daniel Reeves <dreeves Æ umich.edu> |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Sep 2007 20:04:56 -0400 (EDT) |
| Subject: | Re: mind the gap |
This is what is so awesome about improvetheworld. These debates actually *get* somewhere! Seriously, I'm excited about this. :) Let's pause for a straw poll: http://dreeves.wufoo.com/forms/mind-the-gap/ --- \/ FROM James W Mickens AT 07.09.04 16:51 (Today) \/ --- >> And I don't think you clarified what James is saying. He said that more >> real wealth to billionaires does directly hurt poor people. I'd like to >> hear the chain of causality he has in mind. > > According to Graham, "wealth is not money. Money is just a convenient way of > trading one form of wealth for another. Wealth is the underlying stuff---the > goods and services we buy." The underlying stuff, the goods and services, are > constrained resources. For example, using a wealth resource in one way often > prevents its use in a different way; real estate that is used to build a > library can't be used to build a sports stadium. Wealth is also constrained > by the rate at which it can be produced. There are a finite number of > automobiles that can be produced per month. There are a finite number of > hours that doctors can spend treating patients. These figures may improve > over time, but they will still be finite. This means that many types of > wealth are scarce. Ergo, distribution matters. In particular, skewed wealth > distributions directly hurt poor people because there is a finite amount of > wealth for everyone to share, and giving a unit of wealth to one person is > equivalent to taking it away from someone else. Thus, the Daddy Model of > Wealth is not totally broken. Wealth is not money, but many types of wealth > *are* constrained by natural limits. > > A society's wealth can grow over time, but it will never be infinite. Thus, > there will never be enough wealth to maximize everyone's utility. But given > diminishing utility returns on wealth accumulation, sound public policy > should ensure that wealth imbalances do not grow too large. > > ~j > -- http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" "Everything that can be invented has been invented." -- Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents, 1899.

