Message Number: |
579 |
From: |
Daniel Reeves <dreeves Æ umich.edu> |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:05:18 -0500 (EST) |
Subject: |
Re: 40% chance that democrats take both house and senate |
But it's only been in recent elections that the bias has shown up
(according to the GOP website -- I haven't researched this myself).
In any case, those are hypotheses to test, as you say. The conspiracy
theory is plausible enough that it's important we get a scientifically
rigorous answer to this. Reliable sources solicited!
And the conspiracy doesn't have to be vast and across the board -- if
there's an exit poll bias then there should be a measurable exit poll skew
factor that can be adjusted for to detect instances of fraud.
Actually, just checking if the exit poll skew is universal should reveal a
lot. As Matt notes, a vast across-the-board conspiracy is implausible.
--- \/ FROM Matt Rudary AT 06.11.07 20:47 (Today) \/ ---
> What makes 1 more plausible than a vast, right-wing conspiracy that changes
> vote counts across the board in every district without detection? Seriously?
>
> OK, here are a couple hypotheses to test:
>
> 1) Young people are more likely to vote Democratic and are also more likely
> to answer exit polls than older people.
>
> 2) People who work 60+ hours a week are more likely to vote Republican and
> are less likely to answer exit polls than people who work fewer than 60 hours
> per week.
>
> 3) People without jobs are more likely to vote Democratic and are more likely
> to answer exit polls than people with jobs.
>
> There are all sorts of reasons opt-out surveys are less accurate than
> mandatory surveys. These hypotheses may have explanatory power.
>
> Matt
>
> Daniel Reeves wrote:
>> and 6% chance that republicans keep both.
>>
>> ... according to the prediction market at tradesports.com.
>>
>>
>> Question: What do you all think of allegations that Republicans are
>> cheating?
>>
>> Here's some damning evidence from the GOP itself:
>> http://www.gop.com/News/Read.aspx?ID 18
>>
>> From that page:
>> "For reasons that remain unclear, Democratic voters are more likely than
>> Republicans to agree to interview requests from pollsters."
>>
>> (Just to spell it out: If the exit polls favor democrats and the real
>> polls favor republicans, there are two explanations:
>> 1. a democratic bias in exit polls.
>> 2. a republican bias in the real polls.
>> What makes 1 more plausible? Seriously, how do Republicans answer that?
>> This is scary!)
>>
>
--
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves"
A programmer started to cuss
Because getting to sleep was a fuss
As he lay there in bed
Looping 'round in his head
was: while(!asleep()) sheep++;
-- David Jayne (submitted by Dave Morris, 2004)
|