Message Number: |
466 |
From: |
Robert Felty <robfelty Æ umich.edu> |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:40:16 -0400 |
Subject: |
Re: stupid feel-good "no liquids" rule |
James,
You are right to point out this inconsistency. However, consider the
fact that there is very little security on passenger train travel in
the U.S. and in most of Europe. In the U.S., not many people actually
ride trains, so blowing up a few would not be that big a setback, but
in Europe it could be. Blowing up a bunch of railroad tracks in the
U.S. could really cripple shipping though (or major highways). I am
not trying to give the terrorists ideas here, but let's say that they
start targeting some of these outlets as well. We will have to build
up more and more security measures. Where does it stop? We will never
get one step ahead of the terrorists. That is the advantage of the
attacker.
I still don't know all the details of the latest attempted attack,
but it sounds like these attackers never even set foot in an airport.
Their plan was foiled long before that. Evidence recovered after the
9/11 attacks shows that it also probably could have been avoided by
similar means, i.e. by using intelligence agencies, without
inconveniencing travelers.
Rob
On Aug 14, 2006, at 3:53 PM, James W Mickens wrote:
>> Back to Nate and Danny's ideas. I for one would rather not
>> have security in airports whatsoever. I would be plenty happy
>> to take my chances. I don't think that every plane would
>> suddenly start blowing up.
>
> I strongly disagree. By your own analysis, "there are lots of
> people who hate the U.S." and will do organizations like Hamas "a
> favor by harming the evil U.S." If this is true, it couldn't
> possibly be the case that our airplanes would be reasonably safe
> with no security at our airports. In fact, we can almost be certain
> that there would be a huge upswing in terrorists attacks, if only
> because Bin Laden is on the record as saying that he *wants* to hit
> us again. Every one of the Bin Laden tapes contains ominous
> warnings about future attacks. He is not being sarcastic. In
> conjunction with addressing the root causes of terrorism, we have
> to protect ourselves against the people who already hate us now. We
> must be realistic about the dangers that face us. The British,
> American, and Pakistani intelligence agencies just broke up a major
> terrorist plot against airliners. This is the context for the
> entire conversation that we're having now. The threat is real.
>
> ~j
>
>
|