Message Number: |
825 |
From: |
Daniel Reeves <dreeves Æ umich.edu> |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:36:17 -0400 (EDT) |
Subject: |
Re: Good article (religion vs science) |
Thanks Uluc. In related news, I'm no longer an atheist. Sam Harris just
changed my mind about this. Or perhaps put into words a conclusion I
gradually came to over the past couple years:
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris/2007/10/the_prob...
atheism.html
This reminds me of Steve Levitt's bewilderment at the recent spate of
anti-God books (Dennett, Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris, Paulos, Stenger) [1].
It's like writing a book called "Why Bird-Watching is a Waste of Time".
Who would buy that book? It's not going to dissuade bird watchers and
everyone else already agrees and doesn't need to read a book about it!
(I think Levitt is wrong but I found that hilarious.)
Danny
[1] By the way, all of those authors (except Stenger; he sounds good too,
from reviews, but I don't know first-hand) are brilliant and really fun to
read.
> http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_60/iss_8/49_1.shtml
>
> It is titled "Science and the Islamic worldThe quest for rapprochement" by
> Pervez Amirali Hoodbhoy in the department of physics at Quaid-i-Azam
> University in Islamabad, Pakistan.
--
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves"
A computer, to print out a fact,
Will divide, multiply, and subtract.
But this output can be
No more than debris,
If the input was short of exact.
-- Gigo
|