Message Number: |
747 |
From: |
Daniel Reeves <dreeves Æ umich.edu> |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 20:04:56 -0400 (EDT) |
Subject: |
Re: mind the gap |
This is what is so awesome about improvetheworld. These debates actually
*get* somewhere! Seriously, I'm excited about this. :)
Let's pause for a straw poll:
http://dreeves.wufoo.com/forms/mind-the-gap/
--- \/ FROM James W Mickens AT 07.09.04 16:51 (Today) \/ ---
>> And I don't think you clarified what James is saying. He said that more
>> real wealth to billionaires does directly hurt poor people. I'd like to
>> hear the chain of causality he has in mind.
>
> According to Graham, "wealth is not money. Money is just a convenient way of
> trading one form of wealth for another. Wealth is the underlying stuff---the
> goods and services we buy." The underlying stuff, the goods and services, are
> constrained resources. For example, using a wealth resource in one way often
> prevents its use in a different way; real estate that is used to build a
> library can't be used to build a sports stadium. Wealth is also constrained
> by the rate at which it can be produced. There are a finite number of
> automobiles that can be produced per month. There are a finite number of
> hours that doctors can spend treating patients. These figures may improve
> over time, but they will still be finite. This means that many types of
> wealth are scarce. Ergo, distribution matters. In particular, skewed wealth
> distributions directly hurt poor people because there is a finite amount of
> wealth for everyone to share, and giving a unit of wealth to one person is
> equivalent to taking it away from someone else. Thus, the Daddy Model of
> Wealth is not totally broken. Wealth is not money, but many types of wealth
> *are* constrained by natural limits.
>
> A society's wealth can grow over time, but it will never be infinite. Thus,
> there will never be enough wealth to maximize everyone's utility. But given
> diminishing utility returns on wealth accumulation, sound public policy
> should ensure that wealth imbalances do not grow too large.
>
> ~j
>
--
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves"
"Everything that can be invented has been invented."
-- Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents, 1899.
|