Message Number: |
205 |
From: |
robfelty <robfelty Æ umich.edu> |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:27:18 -0400 |
Subject: |
Re: NYTimes.com: Behind Gold's Glitter: Torn Lands and Pointed Questions |
I have not read the article, but Clare and I have titanium rings. They
are cool looking, lightweight, incredibly strong, and relatively cheap.
I wonder how bad diamond mining is for the environment?
Rob
On Oct 25, 2005, at 12:21 PM, Daniel Reeves wrote:
> Never buy anything gold. Check.
>
> --- \/ FROM mjste Æ umich.edu AT 05.10.25 08:46 (Today) \/ ---
>
>> This page was sent to you by: mjste Æ umich.edu.
>>
>> This article is fascinating. I would love your comments on this. Do
>> you think that it is worth it?
>>
>>
>> INTERNATIONAL | October 24, 2005
>> The Cost of Gold | 30 Tons an Ounce: Behind Gold's Glitter: Torn
>> Lands and Pointed Questions By JANE PERLEZ and KIRK JOHNSON
>> Much of the gold left to be mined is microscopic and is being wrung
>> from the earth at enormous environmental cost.
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/24/international/24GOLD.html?emc=eta1
>
> --
> http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - google://"Daniel Reeves"
>
> "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong."
> -- Wolfgang Pauli, on a paper submitted by a physicist colleague
>
>
>
|