|   
        The Chronicle of Higher Education
        June 20, 2003
 
 'Dr. Sex'
 
 A human-sexuality expert creates controversy
        with a new book on gay men and transsexuals
 By ROBIN WILSON
         
        J. Michael Bailey clicks on an audio recording of four men: Two
        are gay and two are straight. Can the audience guess which ones
        are gay just by listening to their voices? asks Mr.Bailey, a
        professor of psychology at Northwestern University.
 
 When the majority of those in the Stanford University lecture
        hall decide that a man with hissy s's and precise articulation
        is gay, the professor pronounces them correct. The lesson: You
        can determine a man's sexual orientation after simply listening
        to him talk for 20 seconds.
 
 Sound like science?
 
 It is billed that way in The Man Who Would Be Queen: The Science
        of Gender-Bending and Transsexualism, a new book aimed at a popular
        audience and published by the prestigious National Academies
        Press. Mr. Bailey, who spoke at Stanford as part of a book tour
        that has also taken him to Emory University and the University
        of California at Los Angeles, is already widely known for his
        studies linking sexual orientation to genes. (His research on
        twins is mentioned in most introductory psychology texts.)
 
 But his latest work has created a bigger buzz than most scholars
        hope to enjoy in their entire careers. Not only does he identify
        a set of interests and behaviors he says can be used to tell
        whether a man is gay, he ties homosexuality to transsexualism.
        The book is receiving praise and damnation in equal measures,
        and the controversy is quickly making the author one of the most
        talked-about sex and gender researchers in academe.
 
 Steven Pinker, a prominent psychologist at the Massachusetts
        Institute of Technology who is about to move to Harvard, wrote
        in a comment for the cover that the book "illuminates the
        mysteries of sexual orientation and identity," deeming it
        "the best book yet" on the subject. In an interview,
        he says Mr. Bailey has "opened up a whole new field by asking
        new questions about sexual preference."
 Other scholars and activists have blasted the book for reinforcing
        inaccurate stereotypes. It has come under the harshest attack
        for challenging the common medical diagnosis of "gender-identity
        disorder," which is used in treating people who want to
        change their sex. Men who want a sex change to become women have
        long been thought of by psychiatrists as "women trapped
        in men's bodies." But Mr. Bailey writes that men who want
        sex-change operations are either extremely gay or are sexual
        fetishists.
 
 The contention has infuriated activists and scholars who are
        transsexual. They have produced reams of strident online commentary
        about Mr. Bailey's book. One Web site calls the book "junk
        science" and likens it to Nazi propaganda.
 
 Daniel I.H. Linzer, dean of the college of arts and sciences
        at Northwestern, says Mr. Bailey's work is "having an impact
        on the field. ... The most we can hope to do as scholars is stimulate
        additional thinking and work. ... That's a wonderful recognition
        of the impact Mike is having now."
 
 Mr. Bailey, chairman of the psychology department at Northwestern,
        teaches "Human Sexuality," one of the most popular
        classes on the campus, with up to 600 undergraduate students
        each year. Some of those students have dubbed him "Dr. Sex"
        or "the Sex Professor." Despite the draw he has on
        the campus, many of the descriptions of Mr. Bailey and his new
        book that have appeared on Web sites and in interviews have been
        ugly. "Cocky," "insensitive," "lurid,"
        "condescending," and "mean-spirited" are
        just some of the designations used.
 
 Academic Nerd
 
 It is hard to imagine that all this venom has been inspired by
        the soft-spoken 45-year-old, who has barely a trace of his native
        Texas drawl. If anything, Mr. Bailey is an academic nerd who
        is just growing into his reputation as a provocateur. He doesn't
        mind exposing what he considers sexual myths, no matter how much
        the results might offend people. And he argues that he is "very
        pro gay," while acknowledging that "the research I
        do isn't." While he counts female transsexuals among his
        friends, he says some "have their feelings hurt" when
        he contends their sex changes were motivated by erotic fantasies,
        not gender-identity problems. But he adds, "I can't be a
        slave to sensitivity."
 
 He majored in mathematics at Washington University in St. Louis,
        married his college sweetheart, and worked as a high-school teacher
        for a couple of years until he enrolled in graduate school at
        the University of Texas at Austin in 1982. He decided against
        an advanced degree in mathematics because, he says, he knew he
        wasn't in the same league as some of the top math students at
        the university. Besides, says the man who now studies transsexuals,
        "two of them were very strange."
 
 Instead, he pursued an interest in Freudian psychology that was
        piqued by an undergraduate history course on the topic. "Freud
        was into all this dark and sexy stuff with the unconscious and
        how people's motives are usually hidden," says Mr. Bailey.
        "I thought, 'I can become a psychoanalyst.'"
 
 But at Texas he quickly grew annoyed with the clinical-psychology
        program. "The people doing it were not really researchers.
        They were more like an authoritarian cult: Believe this or else,"
        he says. He was more attracted to scholars who were "being
        hard-headed and asking questions," and even considering
        unpopular possibilities, like a link between IQ and genes.
 
 Mr. Bailey focused his dissertation on what was then a little-studied
        subject: the biological causes of homosexuality. The project
        ran directly counter to Freud's explanation, which is that gay
        men are the result of overbearing mothers.
 
 The dissertation kicked off an important area of research, which
        Mr. Bailey continued after landing an assistant professorship
        at Northwestern in 1989. Two years later, he was a co-author
        of an article in the Archives of General Psychiatry based on
        a study of brothers that found a genetic component to homosexuality.
        The research found that 52 percent of the identical twins of
        homosexual men were also gay, compared with only 22 percent of
        the fraternal twins and 9.2 percent of the brothers who were
        not twins.
 
 Mr. Bailey makes a point in his book and in his off-campus lectures
        of telling people he is straight. He divorced in 1996, and has
        two all-American looking teenagers, who excel at swimming, wrestling,
        and academics. What's it like to have a sex researcher for a
        dad? The kids know all about their father's work, although Mr.
        Bailey has been known to cover his 16-year-old daughter's ears
        when discussing his research. If the kids visit his office, though,
        they're bound to see some of the dozens of sex-related videotapes
        he uses for his research or in class, including The Sexual Brain,
        Men, Sex, and Rape, and a three-part series: Sex: A Lifelong
        Pleasure.
 
 Mr. Bailey says his divorce, not his research on sexuality, has
        influenced his choice in clothing. Now, instead of a white dress
        shirt and khaki pants, he wears tight-fitting knit shirts, a
        black-leather jacket, and plenty of Ralph Lauren Safari cologne.
        After Northwestern gave him the raise three years ago, the professor
        bought himself a car that stands out as well -- a black BMW 325i.
 
 Still, Mr. Bailey is not a social magnet. He has an awkward,
        bouncy walk and a reserved, sometimes brusque manner. But he
        is well liked, not always the case for a department chairman.
        "He's the kind of person you go to when you have a problem,"
        says David H. Uttal, an associate professor of psychology.
 
 Mr. Bailey lives in an apartment on the edge of Boys' Town, Chicago's
        historic gay district, and frequents gay bars on Halsted Street,
        both for research and for fun. "It is very interesting and
        vibrant and kind of wild," he says.
 
 He recalls one time in 1995 when he took students to a gay bar
        called Vortex, where he was doing research. He was interested
        in drag queens, surmising that they were a link between gay men
        and transsexuals. "There was gay porn on video monitors,
        and here I was with these 21-year-old sorority girls," he
        recalls.
 
 'Politically Incorrect'
 
 Four rooms constitute Mr. Bailey's sex lab in Northwestern's
        Swift Hall. In one room, a graduate student plays videotapes
        of men and women talking and asks visitors to rate the subjects'
        voices and body language on a scale from masculine to feminine.
        It is the kind of research that backs up Mr. Bailey's claim that
        gay men are more effeminate than straight men, and confirms,
        he says, that snap judgments about sexual orientation are often
        correct.
 
 In another small room, graduate students monitor Mr. Bailey's
        most sexually explicit project. Subjects are left alone to watch
        pornographic videos on a small television in a darkened room
        where gauges measure their arousal. The subjects also report
        their own responses by operating an electronic lever.
 
 The arousal study is supported by a $100,000 federal grant from
        the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development,
        and the results are to be published soon in the journal Psychological
        Science. Mr. Bailey found that while straight men are aroused
        by women and gay men are aroused by men, women -- whether heterosexual
        or lesbian -- are bisexual in their arousal, attracted to both
        men and women.
 
 Mr. Bailey likes to call himself "politically incorrect,"
        and takes positions that run contrary to conventional wisdom.
        For example, acting as an expert witness in a 1999 case in Illinois,
        he supported a child molester who requested a reduced jail sentence
        after agreeing to be castrated.
 "People for emotional reasons were saying stuff that simply
        wasn't true, like castration won't work because rape and child
        molestation are crimes of violence, not crimes of sex,"
        says Mr. Bailey. "Although this may have been violent to
        the victims and wasn't sexually enjoyable, that doesn't mean
        it wasn't for the rapist." He wrote an article with another
        psychologist on the subject for the Northwestern University Law
        Review, citing others' research on how castration reduces sex
        drive.
 
 Mr. Bailey also believes AIDS-education campaigns are misguided.
        "Middle-class, straight kids at Northwestern who are having
        sex with other middle-class, straight kids at Northwestern have
        a close to zero chance of getting AIDS," he says. "They
        are being over-worried about AIDS. If people feel there's little
        difference between gay or straight and getting AIDS, gay men
        are going to underestimate the risk."
 
 Those are hot topics in the professor's human-sexuality course.
        But the most popular part of the course actually takes place
        outside the lecture hall. Mr. Bailey invites transsexuals and
        gay men to speak after class, and gives undergraduates free rein
        in asking questions.
 
 Students have requested tips on oral sex and wondered what the
        gay men think about monogamy.
 
 Mr. Bailey says he's never received any flak from Northwestern,
        either about his course or about his research. In fact, when
        the University of Pennsylvania offered him a full professorship
        in 2000, Northwestern matched the offer, giving him a $28,000
        raise, to $92,000 a year.
 
 That doesn't mean everyone on the campus agrees with his work.
        "He is looking to the body for truth, as opposed to social
        and cultural frameworks," says Lane Fenrich, a senior lecturer
        in the history department who teaches gay and lesbian history
        and the history of the AIDS epidemic. "It's in many ways
        no different from the way in which people were trying to look
        for the alleged basis of racial differences in people's bodies."
 
 Gay Femininity
 
 It was during his visits to gay bars near his home that Mr. Bailey
        began to refine his research on gay men's femininity, and came
        to the conclusion that homosexuality and transsexuality are part
        of the same continuum.
 
 Gay men have more feminine traits than straight men, he writes,
        including their interests in fashion and show tunes and their
        choice of occupations, including florist, waiter, and hair stylist.
        If a man is feminine, says Mr. Bailey, it is a key sign that
        he is gay. And if a man is gay, Mr. Bailey says he can tell a
        lot about what that man's childhood was like. He "played
        with dolls and loathed football" and "his best friends
        were girls," he writes in the book.
 
 In fact, writes Mr. Bailey, some gay men are so feminine that
        they want to become women. He calls men who have sex changes
        for that reason "homosexual transsexuals." These people
        are typically very sexy and convincing as women, as well as extremely
        likely to work as escorts, or as waitresses,
 receptionists, and manicurists, he writes. They have trouble
        settling down with a mate because, like gay men, he says, they
        enjoy casual sex with several partners.
 
 The other type of transsexual is completely different, asserts
        Mr. Bailey. These men who want to become women were not particularly
        feminine as little boys and aren't particularly female-looking
        after a sex change.
 
 As men, they may have cross-dressed, or masturbated to fantasies
        of themselves as women, and they typically have "sex reassignment"
        surgery much later in life than do the first type.
 
 Using categories defined in work by other sex researchers, Mr.
        Bailey labels this type of transsexual "autogynephilic,"
        which means they are sexually stimulated by the act of making
        their male bodies female.
 
 Mr. Bailey realizes that most transsexuals won't like his characterization.
        In fact, he says, some are so unwilling to face their motivations
        that they "lie," falling back instead on the more accepted
        "I'm a woman in a man's body" narrative. But, he says,
        their protests don't negate his theory.
 
 Some prominent gay scientists argue that Mr. Bailey's book candidly
        tackles subjects that have been taboo among gay men.
  
        "If you go back a decade or two, people would be much
        more defensive and stridently deny the existence of 'gaydar,'
        and emphasize that gay people are just like straight people,"
        says Simon LeVay, a neuroscientist who has published several
        books on sexuality. "Well, we're not. There's more to being
        gay than who you're sexually attracted to."
 But Niko Besnier, a visiting professor of anthropology at
        the University of California at Los Angeles, believes "there
        is a real homophobic agenda" underneath Mr. Bailey's pronouncements.
        "You cannot judge whether a voice sounds masculine or feminine,"
        says Mr. Besnier. "I can sound much more feminine if I start
        talking about interior decorating, even if I don't change my
        voice."
 Mr. Besnier says there are all kinds of gay men, from the "feminine,
        willowy type to the butch, leather daddy." He was one of
        about a dozen gay and transsexual people who showed up at Mr.
        Bailey's lecture at UCLA this month. While most of them asked
        respectful questions after the professor's talk, some harshly
        criticized Mr. Bailey.
 
 The same group persuaded a bookstore in West Hollywood that caters
        to gay customers to cancel a reading by Mr. Bailey and stop selling
        The Man Who Would Be Queen.
 
 'As Varied as Any Gals'
 
 No one is more outraged by Mr. Bailey's book than transsexual
        activists and scholars who believe he has mischaracterized them.
        One Web site, tsroadmap.com, posted photos of the professor's
        teenage son and daughter, with black bars over their eyes and
        sexually explicit captions underneath. "Bailey's book is
        one of the most insidiously vicious pieces of 'transphobia' ever
        to come out of academia," Andrea James, a transsexual woman,
        wrote on the Web site, where she labeled Mr. Bailey's book a
        "bigoted treatise."
 
 Mr. Bailey says he isn't intimidated by tsroadmap, and he accuses
        Ms. James of "throwing a tantrum and calling me and my family
        names." (Ms. James recently removed the photographs.)
 
 Lynn Conway, a professor emeritus of electrical engineering and
        computer science at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor,
        says Mr. Bailey is threatening to overturn 40 years of mainstream
        scientific thought that says men who want to become women are
        suffering from "gender-identity disorder."
 
 "This book seems like a lurid and reactionary attempt to
        strip us of our hard-won female gender and of our social and
        legal rights, too, by relabeling us as either homosexual men
        or male sexual fetishists," says Ms. Conway. She had a sex-change
        operation 35 years ago and describes herself as a "nice
        married gal" who lives in rural Michigan with her husband
        Charlie, whom she has been with for 15 years.
 
 Ms. Conway and other transsexuals say Mr. Bailey never bothered
        to talk to them, even though many learned about his project and
        offered their views. Instead, they charge, he focused on the
        handful of transsexuals he met in Chicago's gay bars.
 
 "He knows, what, nine gals?" asks Ms. Conway. "I've
        known hundreds of post-op women, and they're all over the boat.
        There is no generalization. They are as varied as any gals are."
 
 Joan Roughgarden, a professor of biology at Stanford University
        who had a sex-change operation in 1998, was so angry about Mr.
        Bailey's book that she wrote a letter to the National Academies
        Press. "In academia, we've lived on this Noah's ark of inclusion,
        and we're sailing along on calm waters when all of the sudden
        we hit this big rock, and that rock is a psychologist,"
        she said in an interview. Mr. Bailey's research method was simple,
        says Ms. Roughgarden. He calls all transsexuals he finds attractive
        "homosexual transsexuals," and all the rest "autogynephilic."
 
 Mr. Bailey's work on transsexuals, unlike his scientific research
        on gay men, is anecdotal, and his book doesn't cite any figures
        to back up his claims. In his defense, he says he "went
        every place I could think of that I'd find a decent chance of
        finding transsexuals" to talk to and observe. That often
        meant gay bars near his home, like the Circuit nightclub.
 
 Mr. Bailey, who bites his cuticles and shifts in his seat during
        a dinner one evening with his children and a reporter, seems
        more comfortable later on at the Circuit. He mixes easily among
        the transsexual women he knows, and buys a round of drinks. Most
        of the women are what Mr. Bailey would call "homosexual
        transsexuals," and unlike their academic counterparts, they
        count Mr. Bailey as their savior.
 
 As a psychologist, he has written letters they needed to get
        sex-reassignment surgery, and he has paid attention to them in
        ways most people don't.
 
 "Not too many people talk about this, but he's bringing
        it into the light," says Veronica, a 31-year-old transsexual
        woman from Ecuador who just got married and doesn't want her
        last name used. A real-estate agent, she wears her black hair
        pulled back in a tight ponytail, and her slight build and smooth
        face would never betray her origin as a man.
 
 Anjelica Kieltyka, a 52-year-old transsexual woman, was the "poster
        girl" for Mr. Bailey's writings on autogynephilia. At least
        on the surface, her appearance matches Mr. Bailey's classification
        to a T: her thinning, bleached-blonde hair is tucked up under
        a brown tweed beret, and her towering frame and broad shoulders
        give her an androgynous look.
 
 But Ms. Kieltyka says the professor twisted her story to
        suit his theory. "I was a male with a sexual-identity disorder,"
        not someone who is living out a sexual fantasy, she says.
 At midnight a show begins on the dance floor. The place is packed,
        and smoke fills the air as the performers sing and dance to Latin
        music.
 
 Mr. Bailey and his guests crane their necks to see, putting his
        theories to the test by wondering aloud whether the performers'
        voices, looks, and movements betray their identity as gay, straight,
        or transsexual.
 
 When the show ends an hour later, the professor and his friends
        head for the dance floor -- where he seems to come alive.
 
 
 http://chronicle.com
 Section: The Faculty
 Volume 49, Issue 41, Page A8
 Copyright © 2003 by The Chronicle of Higher Education
 The Chronicle: 6/20/2003: 'Dr. Sex'
         
        http://chronicle.com/free/v49/i41/41a00801.htm
       |