X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_50,BODY_ENHANCEMENT, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE autolearn=no version=3.2.0 Sender: 1.7 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l4OI8n0b022599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 14:08:49 -0400 Received: from hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.81]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l4OI8jvH016338; Thu, 24 May 2007 14:08:45 -0400 Received: FROM [192.168.1.108] (Unknown [64.9.221.37]) BY hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 4655D46C.91289.13004 ; 24 May 2007 14:07:40 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <268effb00705230743t135c17a3h2a4222428f49ea54 Æ mail.gmail.com> References: <46532eb6.17cf4c70.68dd.ffffdd80SMTPIN_ADDED Æ mx.google.com> <56e157e80705221227u59a5c1eawce5c05b02711d120 Æ mail.gmail.com> <268effb00705230743t135c17a3h2a4222428f49ea54 Æ mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-42--140576542 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.2/3290/Thu May 24 07:22:02 2007 on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:08:06 -0400 To: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Dave Morris Subject: Re: NYTimes.com: Death by Veganism --Apple-Mail-42--140576542 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed Interesting indeed. The argument I would make in response to the original diet is that =20 yes, it is hard to raise a child from scratch on a vegan diet, and no =20= you won't find any natural vegan cultures because they've lacked the =20 technology to do so. But as we sit here in the richest and most =20 technologically advanced nation on the planet, consuming vast amounts =20= of luxury depending on extremely complicated technologies, the point =20 is that we are now able to. More and more it is becoming easily =20 possible for our society to become vegan safely and responsibly. I wouldn't recommend veganism for the poor, either individually or as =20= a nation. Eat whatever you need to in order to survive if surviving =20 at all is what you're struggling to do. Similarly I don't recommend a =20= vegan diet for lions in the jungle- they do what they're capable of, =20 they don't know any better. But if you are rich, educated, and capable, you should consider a =20 vegan diet, or at least a diet heading that direction, avoiding =20 factory grown animal products, because you can. Why cause unnecessary =20= suffering if you don't have to? It boils down to a reasonable amount =20 of effort and a reasonable amount of cost. If may family were =20 starving, I would kill any number of chickens to feed my hungry =20 children. I would kill cattle. I would kill people if necessary. If =20 they were starving and I had no other choice. But if it's a choice =20 between vegan diet and getting digital cable that month... I'd give =20 up the digital cable. That's where many of us are really at. Dave On May 23, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Alyssa Pozniak wrote: > just fyi - the below post originally appeared in a public health-=20 > related listserv i'm on and is in response to the Nina Planck =20 > editorial. > > and just to clarify for us non-vegans out here who aren't familar =20 > w/ the specifics -- does a vegan diet for a newborn mean no =20 > mother's breast milk? eliminating cow's milk (or other mammal's =20 > milk) i understand, but to not feed an infant breast milk as nature =20= > intended seems counter-intuitive to the "mother earth" stance that =20 > often goes hand in hand w/ the vegan/vegetarian way of life (yes i =20 > understand there are exceptions - i'm talking in general terms =20 > though). so i just wanted clarification from vegans in the know =20 > (but i *don't* want to start a debate on whether it's "good" vs. =20 > "bad"! :) > > Posted by: "Jason Ketola" keto0011 Æ umn.edu > > Mon May 21, 2007 12:48 pm (PST) > > Nina Planck's op-ed "Death by Veganism" ironically fails to list any > deaths or even instances of ill-health resulting from well-planned =20 > vegan > diets. > > To a vegan of eight years myself, who's met hundreds of thriving vegan > adults and children, Planck's claims of the inadequacy of the vegan =20= > diet > ring patently untrue. > > It's worth interrogating Nina Planck's connection to the Weston Price > Foundation, which has a financial interest in disparaging veganism in > favor of "real milk" and the like. Not to mention her interest in > selling a book on that very topic. > > Jason > > > > > On 5/23/07, Robert Felty wrote: > Kapoo sent a link to an article which I think is worthy of > improvetheworld discussion. The text of the article and a link to it > are at the bottom. Here is my 2 cents: > > Interesting article, but lacking in one very crucial aspect -- > references. > > I have several books on vegan nutrition which address issues of > Vitamin B12 deficiency and lists way in which it is possible to get > the required nutrients. Certain types of Omega 3 fatty acids are very > difficult to get as a vegan. However, one must also keep in mind that > comparisons between vegetarians and meat-eaters should be made > comparing average health of vegetarians to average health of meat- > eaters, and many such studies show vegetarians to be healthier > overall than omnivores. > > I would very highly recommend "Becoming Vegan" by Brenda Davis and > Vesanto Melina. It has lots of useful nutrition facts, cites many > studies in highly-regarded journals, and lists all references. > > In regards to giving infants soy milk instead of formula, it is well > known that this is a bad idea, and most soymilks have a warning on > the package that it should not be used as infant formula. There are > soy-based formulas though. Here's a link to a page listing a variety > of different formulas: > http://www.babycenter.com/refcap/baby/formulafeed/1334669.html > > I also read a bit more about Crown Shakur on some other blogs. There > were many atypical circumstances in the case. The parents were a > black, vegan couple in Georgia, who gave birth at home, and were > apparently also quite poor. I do think that they probably made some > mistakes, but from my cursory knowledge of the case, it does not seem > that they intentionally killed their baby. I also think it is nearly > impossible to say "beyond the shadow of a doubt" that had they fed > their child differently, it would have lived. One of Clare's friend's > sisters recently lost a child. The child was about 3-4 weeks old, and > was sleeping on the father's chest. Apparently the father dozed off > for a bit, and when he awoke, the baby was cold and blue. I can only > imagine how traumatic this could be, and I cannot imagine having to > go through a trial after such an event. These parents did have to go > through some sort of social services thing, but they were not > punished by law. > > The young and old are both very vulnerable, and much more likely to > die unexpectedly than those in the prime of their lives. Unless there > is reason to believe that the parents of Crown Shakur really did not > want children, I do not think that they should be viewed as > murderers, but rather as parents who just lost a child, and they > should be consoled instead of jailed. Some of this also boils down to > philosophy about the penal system. What is the role of punishment in > the penal system? Is it to deter people from committing further > crimes? Is it to get revenge on the perpetrators? Is it to protect > citizens from being harmed by the criminal? In this case, I think it > is unlikely that the parents of Crown Shakur would harm the child of > other parents. I also find it hard to believe that they would > intentionally kill another child of their own. I think the system is > failing here. These parents should be monitored by social services, > and if they choose to have other children, should be guided as to how > to raise a healthy child within the constraints of their beliefs. > > One final note: Consider an alternative situation: an infant gets a > high fever, but is not taken to the hospital or given drugs because > the parents are Christian Scientists, and do not believe in modern > medicine. The baby dies. Have these parents committed murder? > > Rob > > ARTICLE TEXT > ------------------------------------------ > WHEN Crown Shakur died of starvation, he was 6 weeks old and weighed > 3.5 pounds. His vegan parents, who fed him mainly soy milk and apple > juice, were convicted in Atlanta recently of murder, involuntary > manslaughter and cruelty. > Skip to next paragraph > Jacob Magraw-Mickelson > > This particular calamity =97 at least the third such conviction of > vegan parents in four years =97 may be largely due to ignorance. But = it > should prompt frank discussion about nutrition. > > I was once a vegan. But well before I became pregnant, I concluded > that a vegan pregnancy was irresponsible. You cannot create and > nourish a robust baby merely on foods from plants. > > Indigenous cuisines offer clues about what humans, naturally > omnivorous, need to survive, reproduce and grow: traditional > vegetarian diets, as in India, invariably include dairy and eggs for > complete protein, essential fats and vitamins. There are no vegan > societies for a simple reason: a vegan diet is not adequate in the > long run. > > Protein deficiency is one danger of a vegan diet for babies. > Nutritionists used to speak of proteins as "first class" (from meat, > fish, eggs and milk) and "second class" (from plants), but today this > is considered denigrating to vegetarians. > > The fact remains, though, that humans prefer animal proteins and fats > to cereals and tubers, because they contain all the essential amino > acids needed for life in the right ratio. This is not true of plant > proteins, which are inferior in quantity and quality =97 even soy. > > A vegan diet may lack vitamin B12, found only in animal foods; usable > vitamins A and D, found in meat, fish, eggs and butter; and necessary > minerals like calcium and zinc. When babies are deprived of all these > nutrients, they will suffer from retarded growth, rickets and nerve > damage. > > Responsible vegan parents know that breast milk is ideal. It contains > many necessary components, including cholesterol (which babies use to > make nerve cells) and countless immune and growth factors. When > breastfeeding isn't possible, soy milk and fruit juice, even in > seemingly sufficient quantities, are not safe substitutes for a > quality infant formula. > > Yet even a breast-fed baby is at risk. Studies show that vegan breast > milk lacks enough docosahexaenoic acid, or DHA, the omega-3 fat found > in fatty fish. It is difficult to overstate the importance of DHA, > vital as it is for eye and brain development. > > A vegan diet is equally dangerous for weaned babies and toddlers, who > need plenty of protein and calcium. Too often, vegans turn to soy, > which actually inhibits growth and reduces absorption of protein and > minerals. That's why health officials in Britain, Canada and other > countries express caution about soy for babies. (Not here, though =97 > perhaps because our farm policy is so soy-friendly.) > > Historically, diet honored tradition: we ate the foods that our > mothers, and their mothers, ate. Now, your neighbor or sibling may be > a meat-eater or vegetarian, may ferment his foods or eat them raw. > This fragmentation of the American menu reflects admirable diversity > and tolerance, but food is more important than fashion. Though it's > not politically correct to say so, all diets are not created equal. > > An adult who was well-nourished in utero and in infancy may choose to > get by on a vegan diet, but babies are built from protein, calcium, > cholesterol and fish oil. Children fed only plants will not get the > precious things they need to live and grow. > > Nina Planck is the author of "Real Food: What to Eat and Why." > > > On May 22, 2007, at 3:27 PM, Christine Kapusky wrote: > > > Interesting... > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: jjk514 Æ gmail.com < jjk514 Æ gmail.com> > > Date: May 22, 2007 10:56 AM > > Subject: NYTimes.com: Death by Veganism > > To: ckapoo Æ gmail.com > > > > [image: The New York Times] > > [image: E-mail > > This] *This page was sent to you by: * jjk514 Æ gmail.com > > > > Message from sender: > > fyi. > > > > * OPINION * | May 21, 2007 > > * Op-Ed Contributor: Death by Veganism > > < http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/21/opinion/21planck.html? > > ex=3D1180497600&en=3Df83902b3c8513583&ei=3D5070&emc=3Deta1> > > * > > By NINA PLANCK > > You cannot create and nourish a robust baby merely on foods from > > plants. > > > > [image: Most E-mailed] > > 1. Op-Ed Contributor: Death by > > Veganism< http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/21/opinion/21planck.html? > > ex=3D1180497600&en=3Df83902b3c8513583&ei=3D5070&emc=3Deta1> > > 2. This Is Your Life (and How You Tell > > It)< http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/22/health/psychology/=20 > 22narr.html? > > ex=3D1180497600&en=3D12d9da8976db7071&ei=3D5070&emc=3Deta1> > > 3. Mysteries to Behold in the Dark Down Deep: Seadevils and Species > > Unknown > ex=3D1180497600&en=3D1f342008210cb27f&ei=3D5070&emc=3Deta1> > > 4. Books of The Times: Al Gore Speaks of a Nation in > > Danger > ex=3D1180497600&en=3Db05d19a086e3f485&ei=3D5070&emc=3Deta1> > > 5. Executive on a Mission: Saving the > > Planet< http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/22/science/earth/=20 > 22ander.html ? > > ex=3D1180497600&en=3D64e3c95b9e4bc5cc&ei=3D5070&emc=3Deta1> > > > > =BB Go to Complete List < http://www.nytimes.com/gst/=20 > mostemailed.html ? > > type=3D1> > > > > Copyright 2007 > > < http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/copyright.html> The > > New York > > Times Company | Privacy > > Policy > > > > > > > > -- > > "Life is what happens to you when you're busy making other plans." > > John > > Lennon > > Dave Morris cell: 734-476-8769 http://www-personal.umich.edu/~thecat/ --Apple-Mail-42--140576542 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Interesting indeed.

The argument I would make = in response to the original diet is that yes, it is hard to raise a = child from scratch on a vegan diet, and no you won't find any natural = vegan cultures because they've lacked the technology to do so. But as we = sit here in the richest and most technologically advanced nation on the = planet, consuming vast amounts of luxury depending on extremely = complicated technologies, the point is that we are now able to. More and = more it is becoming easily possible for our society to become vegan = safely and responsibly.

I wouldn't recommend = veganism for the poor, either individually or as a nation. Eat whatever = you need to in order to survive if surviving at all is what you're = struggling to do. Similarly I don't recommend a vegan diet for lions in = the jungle- they do what they're capable of, they don't know any = better.=A0

But = if you are rich, educated, and capable, you should consider a vegan = diet, or at least a diet heading that direction, avoiding factory grown = animal products, because you can. Why cause unnecessary suffering if you = don't have to? It boils down to a reasonable amount of effort and a = reasonable amount of cost. If may family were starving, I would kill any = number of chickens to feed my hungry children. I would kill cattle. I = would kill people if necessary. If they were starving and I had no other = choice. But if it's a choice between vegan diet and getting digital = cable that month... I'd give up the digital cable. That's where many of = us are really at.

Dave


=A0
On May 23, = 2007, at 10:43 AM, Alyssa Pozniak wrote:

just = fyi - the below post originally appeared in a public health-related = listserv i'm on and is in response to the Nina Planck editorial.
=
=A0
and just to clarify for us non-vegans out here who = aren't familar w/ the specifics -- does a vegan diet for a newborn mean = no mother's breast milk?=A0 eliminating cow's milk (or other mammal's = milk) i understand, but to not feed an infant breast milk as nature = intended seems counter-intuitive to the "mother earth" stance that often = goes hand in hand w/ the vegan/vegetarian way of life (yes i understand = there are exceptions - i'm talking in general terms though).=A0 so i = just wanted clarification from vegans in the know=A0 (but i *don't* want = to start a debate on whether it's "good" vs. "bad"! :)
=
=A0

Posted by: "Jason Ketola" keto0011 Æ umn.edu

Mon May=A021,=A02007 = 12:48=A0pm (PST)

Nina Planck's op-ed "Death by Veganism" = ironically fails to list any
deaths or even instances of ill-health = resulting from well-planned vegan
diets.

To a vegan of eight = years myself, who's met hundreds of thriving vegan =
adults and children, Planck's claims of the inadequacy = of the vegan diet
ring patently untrue.

It's worth = interrogating Nina Planck's connection to the Weston Price =
Foundation, which has a financial interest in disparaging veganism = in
favor of "real milk" and the like. Not to mention her interest in =
selling a book on that very topic.

Jason
=
=A0


=A0
On = 5/23/07, Robert Felty <robfelty Æ gmail.com > wrote:
Kapoo sent a link to an article = which I think is worthy of
improvetheworld discussion. The text of = the article and a link to it
are at the bottom. Here is my 2 = cents:

Interesting article, but lacking in one very crucial = aspect --
references.

I have several books on vegan nutrition = which address issues of
Vitamin B12 deficiency and lists way in which = it is possible to get
the required nutrients. Certain types of Omega = 3 fatty acids are very
difficult to get as a vegan. However, one must = also keep in mind that
comparisons between vegetarians and = meat-eaters should be made
comparing average health of vegetarians to = average health of meat-
eaters, and many such studies show = vegetarians to be healthier
overall than omnivores.

I would = very highly recommend "Becoming Vegan"=A0=A0by Brenda Davis = and
Vesanto Melina. It has lots of useful nutrition facts, cites many =
studies in highly-regarded journals, and lists all = references.

In regards to giving infants soy milk instead of = formula, it is well
known that this is a bad idea, and most soymilks = have a warning on
the package that it should not be used as infant = formula. There are
soy-based formulas though. Here's a link to a = page listing a variety
of different formulas:
= http://www.babycenter.com/refcap/baby/formulafeed/1334669.html =

I also read a bit more about Crown Shakur on some other = blogs. There
were many atypical circumstances in the case. The = parents were a
black, vegan couple in Georgia, who gave birth at = home, and were
apparently also quite poor. I do think that they = probably made some
mistakes, but from my cursory knowledge of the = case, it does not seem
that they intentionally killed their baby. I = also think it is nearly
impossible to say "beyond the shadow of a = doubt" that had they fed
their child differently, it would have = lived. One of Clare's friend's
sisters recently lost a child. The = child was about 3-4 weeks old, and
was sleeping on the father's = chest. Apparently the father dozed off
for a bit, and when he awoke, = the baby was cold and blue. I can only
imagine how traumatic this = could be, and I cannot imagine having to
go through a trial after = such an event. These parents did have to go
through some sort of = social services thing, but they were not
punished by law.

The = young and old are both very vulnerable, and much more likely to
die = unexpectedly than those in the prime of their lives. Unless there
is = reason to believe that the parents of Crown Shakur really did not =
want children, I do not think that they should be viewed = as
murderers, but rather as parents who just lost a child, and they =
should be consoled instead of jailed. Some of this also boils down = to
philosophy about the penal system. What is the role of punishment = in
the penal system? Is it to deter people from committing = further
crimes? Is it to get revenge on the perpetrators? Is it to = protect
citizens from being harmed by the criminal? In this case, I = think it
is unlikely that the parents of Crown Shakur would harm the = child of
other parents. I also find it hard to believe that they = would
intentionally kill another child of their own. I think the = system is
failing here. These parents should be monitored by social = services,
and if they choose to have other children, should be guided = as to how
to raise a healthy child within the constraints of their = beliefs.

One final note: Consider an alternative situation: an = infant gets a
high fever, but is not taken to the hospital or given = drugs because
the parents are Christian Scientists, and do not = believe in modern
medicine. The baby dies. Have these parents = committed murder?

Rob

ARTICLE = TEXT
------------------------------------------
WHEN Crown Shakur = died of starvation, he was 6 weeks old and weighed
3.5 pounds. His = vegan parents, who fed him mainly soy milk and apple
juice, were = convicted in Atlanta recently of murder, involuntary
manslaughter and = cruelty.
Skip to next paragraph
Jacob Magraw-Mickelson

This = particular calamity =97 at least the third such conviction of
vegan = parents in four years =97 may be largely due to ignorance. But = it
should prompt frank discussion about nutrition.

I was once = a vegan. But well before I became pregnant, I concluded
that a vegan = pregnancy was irresponsible. You cannot create and
nourish a robust = baby merely on foods from plants.

Indigenous cuisines offer clues = about what humans, naturally
omnivorous, need to survive, reproduce = and grow: traditional
vegetarian diets, as in India, invariably = include dairy and eggs for
complete protein, essential fats and = vitamins. There are no vegan
societies for a simple reason: a vegan = diet is not adequate in the
long run.

Protein deficiency is = one danger of a vegan diet for babies.
Nutritionists used to speak = of proteins as "first class" (from meat,
fish, eggs and milk) and = "second class" (from plants), but today this
is considered = denigrating to vegetarians.

The fact remains, though, that = humans prefer animal proteins and fats
to cereals and tubers, = because they contain all the essential amino
acids needed for life in = the right ratio. This is not true of plant
proteins, which are = inferior in quantity and quality =97 even soy.

A vegan diet may = lack vitamin B12, found only in animal foods; usable
vitamins A and = D, found in meat, fish, eggs and butter; and necessary
minerals like = calcium and zinc. When babies are deprived of all these
nutrients, = they will suffer from retarded growth, rickets and nerve
= damage.

Responsible vegan parents know that breast milk is ideal. = It contains
many necessary components, including cholesterol (which = babies use to
make nerve cells) and countless immune and growth = factors. When
breastfeeding isn't possible, soy milk and fruit = juice, even in
seemingly sufficient quantities, are not safe = substitutes for a
quality infant formula.

Yet even a = breast-fed baby is at risk. Studies show that vegan breast
milk = lacks enough docosahexaenoic acid, or DHA, the omega-3 fat found
in = fatty fish. It is difficult to overstate the importance of DHA,
vital = as it is for eye and brain development.

A vegan diet is equally = dangerous for weaned babies and toddlers, who
need plenty of protein = and calcium. Too often, vegans turn to soy,
which actually inhibits = growth and reduces absorption of protein and
minerals. That's why = health officials in Britain, Canada and other
countries express = caution about soy for babies. (Not here, though =97
perhaps because = our farm policy is so soy-friendly.)

Historically, diet honored = tradition: we ate the foods that our
mothers, and their mothers, = ate. Now, your neighbor or sibling may be
a meat-eater or = vegetarian, may ferment his foods or eat them raw.
This fragmentation = of the American menu reflects admirable diversity
and tolerance, but = food is more important than fashion. Though it's
not politically = correct to say so, all diets are not created equal.

An adult who = was well-nourished in utero and in infancy may choose to
get by on a = vegan diet, but babies are built from protein, calcium,
cholesterol = and fish oil. Children fed only plants will not get the
precious = things they need to live and grow.

Nina Planck is the author of = "Real Food: What to Eat and Why."


On May 22, 2007, at 3:27 = PM, Christine Kapusky wrote:

> Interesting...
= >
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: jjk514 Æ gmail.com = < = jjk514 Æ gmail.com>
> Date: May 22, 2007 10:56 AM
> = Subject: NYTimes.com: Death by Veganism
> To: ckapoo Æ gmail.com
>
>=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0[image: The New York Times] <http://www.nytimes.com/ >
> [image: = E-mail
> This]=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 *This page was sent to you by: * = jjk514 Æ gmail.com
>
> Message from = sender:
> fyi.
>
> * OPINION *=A0=A0 | May 21, 2007 =
> * Op-Ed Contributor:=A0=A0Death by Veganism
> < = http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/21/opinion/21planck.html?
> = ex=3D1180497600&en=3Df83902b3c8513583&ei=3D5070&emc=3Deta1>=
> *
> By NINA PLANCK
> You cannot create and nourish = a robust baby merely on foods from
> plants.
>
> = [image: Most E-mailed]
> 1. Op-Ed Contributor: Death by
> = Veganism< = http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/21/opinion/21planck.html?
> = ex=3D1180497600&en=3Df83902b3c8513583&ei=3D5070&emc=3Deta1>=
> 2. This Is Your Life (and How You Tell
> It)< = http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/22/health/psychology/22narr.html?
&g= t; ex=3D1180497600&en=3D12d9da8976db7071&ei=3D5070&emc=3Deta1&= gt;
> 3. Mysteries to Behold in the Dark Down Deep: Seadevils and = Species
> Unknown<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/22/science/22deep.html?
> = ex=3D1180497600&en=3D1f342008210cb27f&ei=3D5070&emc=3Deta1>=
> 4. Books of The Times: Al Gore Speaks of a Nation in
> = Danger<
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/22/books/22kaku.html = ?
> = ex=3D1180497600&en=3Db05d19a086e3f485&ei=3D5070&emc=3Deta1>=
> 5. Executive on a Mission: Saving the
> Planet< = http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/22/science/earth/22ander.html = ?
> = ex=3D1180497600&en=3D64e3c95b9e4bc5cc&ei=3D5070&emc=3Deta1>=
>
> =BB=A0=A0Go to Complete List < = http://www.nytimes.com/gst/mostemailed.html ?
> = type=3D1>
>
>=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Copyright = 2007
> < = http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/copyright.html> = The
> New York
> Times Company <http://www.nytco.com/ > | Privacy
> = Policy<http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/privacy.htm= l >
>
>
>
> --
> "Life is what = happens to you when you're busy making other plans."
> = John
> = Lennon



Dave = Morris
cell: 734-476-8769

=

= --Apple-Mail-42--140576542--