------=_Part_5045_8217923.1173507823484
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
I think your links are missing?
Lisa
On 3/9/07, Ashley S Bangert wrote:
>
> I thought that some of you might be interested in what the Society for
> Neuroscience has to say about love and the Brain. Check out the following
> website and note the cited journal articles at the bottom of the page.
>
> Ashley S. Bangert
> Ph.D. Candidate
> Department of Psychology
> 530 Church St.
> Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043
> Office: 4441 East Hall
> Office Phone: (734) 763-1532
> email: abangert Æ umich.edu
>
>
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Dave Morris wrote:
>
> > I believe, and think that I have seen, that many people feel love very
> > differently, and that it can work quite differently for different
> people,
> > both in what is required to maintain it, and in whether they can feel it
> for
> > more than one person at a time. Quite a few problems in relationships
> arise
> > because of this fact, because one partner may assume that love works the
> same
> > way for their counterpart as for themselves, and thus misinterpret their
> > actions- mistrust their emotions.
> >
> > Recent studies are beginning to detect what scientists believe are
> > electromagnetic signs of that "in love" feeling in the brain, which is
> > apparently differentiable from lust and other emotions. But this is just
> > beginning, it will be some time before they can draw general conclusions
> and
> > explore the full range of possibility of human emotion. And there's a
> > frightening though- what if your partner could put a hat on you and ask
> you
> > if you are "in love" with them and the computer would tell them whether
> or
> > not you're lying. Or maybe would that be a good thing? Hmmm.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 9, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Daniel Reeves wrote:
> >
> >>> the pysiological condition of being "in love" is only possible with
> one
> >>> person at a time. If you can't relate to what I'm talking about, then
> >>> you've never really been in love.
> >>
> >> So judgmental! I think second guessing people's emotions is a bad
> idea.
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves"
> >>
> >> Irrationality is the square root of all evil.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > David P. Morris, PhD
> > Operations Manager and Senior Engineer
> > ElectroDynamic Applications, Inc.
> > morris Æ edapplications.com, (734)786-1434, fax: (734)786-3235
> >
> >
> >
> >
------=_Part_5045_8217923.1173507823484
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
I think your links are missing? Lisa On 3/9/07, Ashley S Bangert <
abangert Æ umich.edu > wrote:
I thought that some of you might be interested in what the Society for
Neuroscience has to say about love and the Brain. Check out the following
website and note the cited journal articles at the bottom of the page. Ashley
S. Bangert Ph.D. Candidate Department of Psychology 530 Church St. Ann Arbor,
MI 48109-1043 Office: 4441 East Hall
Office Phone: (734) 763-1532 email: abangert Æ umich.edu On Fri, 9 Mar
2007, Dave Morris wrote: > I believe, and think that I have seen, that many
people feel love very
> differently, and that it can work quite differently for different people,
> both in what is required to maintain it, and in whether they can feel it
for > more than one person at a time. Quite a few problems in relationships
arise
> because of this fact, because one partner may assume that love works the
same > way for their counterpart as for themselves, and thus misinterpret
their > actions- mistrust their emotions. >
> Recent studies are beginning to detect what scientists believe are >
electromagnetic signs of that "in love" feeling in the brain, which is >
apparently differentiable from lust and other emotions. But this is just
> beginning, it will be some time before they can draw general conclusions
and > explore the full range of possibility of human emotion. And there s
a > frightening though- what if your partner could put a hat on you and ask
you
> if you are "in love" with them and the computer would tell them whether
or > not you re lying. Or maybe would that be a good thing? Hmmm. > >
Dave > > > > On Mar 9, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Daniel Reeves wrote:
> >>> the pysiological condition of being "in love" is only
possible with one >>> person at a time. If you can t relate to what I
m talking about, then >>> you ve never really been in love.
>> >> So judgmental! I think second guessing people s emotions is
a bad idea. >> >> -- >>
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves
- - search://"Daniel Reeves" >> >> Irrationality is the square
root of all evil. >> >> >> > David P. Morris, PhD >
Operations Manager and Senior Engineer
> ElectroDynamic Applications, Inc. > morris Æ edapplications.com
, (734)786-1434, fax: (734)786-3235 > > > >
------=_Part_5045_8217923.1173507823484--
|
