X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.0-r431796 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l2A4rqGc005262 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:53:53 -0500 Received: from skycaptain.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.93.160]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2A4rmJ7018117; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:53:48 -0500 Received: FROM cadash.gpcc.itd.umich.edu (cadash.gpcc.itd.umich.edu [141.211.2.218]) BY skycaptain.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 45F239D2.781C3.4600 ; 9 Mar 2007 23:53:38 -0500 X-X-Sender: abangert Æ cadash.gpcc.itd.umich.edu In-Reply-To: <3a58138836fc8b56dde2b1c8ffff4b00 Æ umich.edu> Message-ID: References: <3a58138836fc8b56dde2b1c8ffff4b00 Æ umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-745678334-1556346003-1173502418=:31632" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r431796 (2006-08-16) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:53:38 -0500 (EST) To: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Ashley S Bangert Subject: Re: Grandpa Andrew's Reflections on Marriage This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---745678334-1556346003-1173502418=:31632 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE I thought that some of you might be interested in what the Society for=20 Neuroscience has to say about love and the Brain. Check out the following= =20 website and note the cited journal articles at the bottom of the page. Ashley S. Bangert Ph.D. Candidate Department of Psychology 530 Church St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043 Office: 4441 East Hall Office Phone: (734) 763-1532 email: abangert Æ umich.edu On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Dave Morris wrote: > I believe, and think that I have seen, that many people feel love very=20 > differently, and that it can work quite differently for different people,= =20 > both in what is required to maintain it, and in whether they can feel it = for=20 > more than one person at a time. Quite a few problems in relationships ari= se=20 > because of this fact, because one partner may assume that love works the = same=20 > way for their counterpart as for themselves, and thus misinterpret their= =20 > actions- mistrust their emotions. > > Recent studies are beginning to detect what scientists believe are=20 > electromagnetic signs of that "in love" feeling in the brain, which is=20 > apparently differentiable from lust and other emotions. But this is just= =20 > beginning, it will be some time before they can draw general conclusions = and=20 > explore the full range of possibility of human emotion. And there's a= =20 > frightening though- what if your partner could put a hat on you and ask y= ou=20 > if you are "in love" with them and the computer would tell them whether o= r=20 > not you're lying. Or maybe would that be a good thing? Hmmm. > > Dave > > > > On Mar 9, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Daniel Reeves wrote: > >>> the pysiological condition of being "in love" is only possible with one= =20 >>> person at a time. If you can't relate to what I'm talking about, then= =20 >>> you've never really been in love. >>=20 >> So judgmental! I think second guessing people's emotions is a bad idea. >>=20 >> --=20 >> http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" >>=20 >> Irrationality is the square root of all evil. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 > David P. Morris, PhD > Operations Manager and Senior Engineer > ElectroDynamic Applications, Inc. > morris Æ edapplications.com, (734)=A0786-1434, fax: (734)=A0786-3235 > > > > ---745678334-1556346003-1173502418=:31632--