| Message Number: | 629 |
| From: | "Clare Dibble" <clare.dibble Æ gmail.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:19:47 -0500 |
| Subject: | Re: more reasons to be vegetarian |
Being married to Rob, I have become much more likely to seek out and purchase free range this or organic that with a good smattering of locally grown food, especially produce. I find that typically the environmentally friendly options available are typically 1.5 to 3 times as expensive as the "traditional" versions, though good finds are occasionally even cheaper than the factory farmed alternatives. I would propose if people wanted to participate in such a scheme, they use numbers something like this. And I'm not sure I would limit it to animal consumption... Every time I have been or tried to be vegetarian or vegan, I have gained weight. I'm just curious if anyone else has had this experience. I know Rob lost weight when he shifted his diet away from meat. Any other changes people notice when eating fewer animals or animal products? On 1/25/07, Joshua J Estelle wrote: > > The text of this article is about how mass farming of meat is bad > > for the environment, not that eating meat is bad for the > > environment. If eating meat alone was bad for the environment, then > > eradicating all carnivores would solve our global warming problem, no? > > It is true that locally raised meet likely has negligible negative > impact and that the real problem is mass farming of meat, but I think > even very environmentally conscious meat eaters are unlikely to > always eat "good" meat. > > > To change the topic slightly, your article reminded me of a very > > interesting essay by Jared Diamond (the "Guns, Germs, and Steel" > > guy) claiming that farming was the worst mistake humanity ever made: > > While farming may not also be perfect, it is by far the lesser evil > to eating meat. Consider we have to feed 10 people for 1 year. Then > think about how much land and resources you would need to feed them a > meat eating diet. Each animal they eat will need a tremendous amount > of resources to raise that animal to be eaten. Then consider if > those 10 people were vegetarians. The amount of land and resources > needed to feed them would be drastically smaller. > > It's just more efficient to be vegetarian. > > I think I just discovered my short answer to when people ask me why > I'm vegetarian, "It's just more efficient." > > Best, > Josh > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Robert Felty wrote: > > > >> Really great article about how eating meat is bad for the > >> environment. Thanks to Clare for pointing it out to me. > >> You can read it at: > >> http://www.commondreams.org/views07/0120-20.htm > >> > >

