X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham  	version=3.2.0-r431796
Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE
Return-Path: <improvetheworld-errors &AElig umich.edu>
Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l0P3osTK014394 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) 	for <dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:50:55 -0500
Received: from jeffrey.mr.itd.umich.edu (mx.umich.edu [141.211.14.132]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0P3onTZ011100; 	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:50:49 -0500
Received: FROM newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	BY jeffrey.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 45B82914.1D5AB.24249 ;  	24 Jan 2007 22:50:44 -0500
Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (boston.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.61]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0P3ofjH011073 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); 	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:50:41 -0500
Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l0P3oeTK014383 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); 	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:50:41 -0500
Received: from localhost (dreeves &AElig localhost) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id l0P3oe0X014380; 	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:50:40 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: boston.eecs.umich.edu: dreeves owned process doing -bs
X-X-Sender: dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701240930490.20024 &AElig defender.gpcc.itd.umich.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701242238060.30196 &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701231835580.30196 &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701240930490.20024 &AElig defender.gpcc.itd.umich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r431796 (2006-08-16) on  	newman.eecs.umich.edu
X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS
X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:50:40 -0500 (EST)
To: Yevgeniy Vorobeychik <yvorobey &AElig umich.edu>
cc: improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu
From: Daniel Reeves <dreeves &AElig umich.edu>
Subject: Re: want to kill this thread yet? just wait...

I'm very loyal to Yahoo products, except in cases where the competition 
kicks our ass.  For search, Yahoo is currently about as good as Google 
(sometimes better, sometimes worse).  And for tons of more esoteric things 
-- bookmarking with del.icio.us for example, or cutting-edge 
microeconomics research -- we rule.

By the way, the mute feature is nice, but any mail client that supports 
threaded conversations (presumably all of them) makes it very simple to 
delete a whole thread in a swell foop.  At worst, sort by thread and hit 
delete a bunch of times in a row.

That's why I've been saying as a general rule for improvetheworld, don't 
hesitate (much) to chime in on a conversation.  Do hesitate (at least a 
little) to start a new thread with a new subject line.


--- \/   FROM Yevgeniy Vorobeychik AT 07.01.24 09:31 (Today)   \/ ---

> It's a little ironic that you work for Yahoo and yet use gmail...
>
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Daniel Reeves wrote:
>
>> In gmail you just press m and all subsequent responses bypass your inbox 
>> and get archived (yet stay marked as unread).
>>
>>  http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=47787&topic=1565
>> 
>> Let's try it.  Everyone chime in with a random, asinine thought of the day.
>> 
>> -- 
>> http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves  - -  search://"Daniel Reeves"
>> 
>> "This isn't right.  This isn't even wrong."
>>  -- Wolfgang Pauli, on a paper submitted by a physicist colleague
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>

-- 
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves  - -  search://"Daniel Reeves"

"As far as I know, this computer has never had an undetected error."