X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham  	version=3.2.0-r431796
Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE
Return-Path: <improvetheworld-errors &AElig umich.edu>
Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l0ONdRTK030271 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) 	for <dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:39:27 -0500
Received: from dave.mr.itd.umich.edu (mx.umich.edu [141.211.14.131]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0ONdLPp020465; 	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:39:21 -0500
Received: FROM newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	BY dave.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 45B7EE26.9BEB6.25096 ;  	24 Jan 2007 18:39:18 -0500
Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (boston.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.61]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0ONdFcL020425 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); 	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:39:15 -0500
Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l0ONdETK030257 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); 	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:39:14 -0500
Received: from localhost (dreeves &AElig localhost) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id l0ONdEw9030254; 	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:39:14 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: boston.eecs.umich.edu: dreeves owned process doing -bs
X-X-Sender: dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu
In-Reply-To: <5ed707a10701241505u34711160x67144c2e8f573025 &AElig mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701241809061.30196 &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>
References: <5FBB2176-92EF-4F1E-8ACE-38A7A187D671 &AElig umich.edu>    <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701241524480.9931 &AElig columbus.eecs.umich.edu>    <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701241819410.6089 &AElig smtp.eecs.umich.edu>  <5ed707a10701241505u34711160x67144c2e8f573025 &AElig mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r431796 (2006-08-16) on  	newman.eecs.umich.edu
X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS
X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:39:14 -0500 (EST)
To: bethany soule <bsoule &AElig gmail.com>
cc: Nathan Binkert <nate &AElig binkert.org>, Nate Clark <ntclark &AElig eecs.umich.edu>,         Robert Felty <robfelty &AElig umich.edu>, improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu
From: Daniel Reeves <dreeves &AElig umich.edu>
Subject: Re: more reasons to be vegetarian

> not only do farmers not pay their own environmental costs, the whole 
> industry is heavily subsidized by the government. I wish I understood 
> that system better.

I see this as an instance of a more general problem, namely corporate 
welfare, and it's sick sick sick.

As for farmers passing on the cost to consumers, I agree, that's exactly 
the point.  Like Bethany and others, including the article Rob sent, are 
saying, it's ultimately our choices as consumers that matter.  (Except 
when our misguided government -- on both sides of the aisle -- literally 
pays (forces us to pay) factory farms and other companies to produce stuff 
we don't want!)

I have a proposal:  let's estimate the long term environmental cost of 
eating a hamburger (ideas on how solicited -- don't say it's impossible, 
we can at least put an upper bound on it) and pledge to set aside that 
much money for an environmental charity per hamburger (etc) we eat.

Who's in?

-- 
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves  - -  search://"Daniel Reeves"

"Politicians are like diapers; both should be changed regularly, and
for the same reason."