"helmet laws are bad for the gene pool."

On 1/22/07, Lisa Hsu   wrote:
> does this dislike of bans/laws extend to things like motorcycle/bicycle
> helmets, seatbelts, and the like?
>
> just curious.
>
> lisa
>
>
> On 1/22/07, Daniel Reeves   wrote:
> >    It took a while but Cam Wicklow's and Matt Rudary's (and possibly other
> > of my opponents in this debate who I'm forgetting) points have finally
> > fully sunk in.  (The greatest thing about improvetheworld in my opinion is
> > how often we prove Carl Sagan's otherwise apt obversation about political
> > debate wrong (see appended email signature).)
> >
> >    I no longer support smoke-free workplace laws!
> >
> >    The right strategy is a coherent policy that upholds everyone's
> freedom:
> > freedom to smoke and freedom to not breathe smoke.	For example, mandated
> > risk-pay (i.e., the very real risk of cancer for the waitstaff of smoky
> > bars) could make it expensive enough to allow smoking that a minority of
> > establishments would choose to.  Voila, everyone's happy!  I'm really sick
> > of governments banning things.  It's a dangerous precedent.
> >    Basically, I think policy-makers should be more like mathematicians.
> > Smoking in bars and restaurants is/was a real social problem.  But there
> > are ways to fix it without adding laws.  In fact, we can fix it by
> > generalizing, clarifying, and consistently enforcing existing laws.
> > Risk-pay is one way.  Another way is to generalize liquor-license laws to
> > include smoking, i.e., directly make it more expensive for bar and
> > restaurant owners to allow smoking.
> >    It really boils down to the Golden Rule.  Banning something is A-OK
> > when you don't happen to want to do that thing anyway.  But worry about
> > the precedent you're setting for when the government decides that *your*
> > favorite risky activity is a danger to yourself and others.
> >    I should confess though that part of the reason I finally saw the light
> > on this is that, living in supposedly smoke-free New York City you can't
> > walk a block without getting three facefuls of smoke.
> >   I keep thinking how nice it would be to get the smokers into some kind
> of
> > special smoking establishments -- "bars" if you will -- and off the damn
> > sidewalks!	Oh the irony.
> >
> >    And don't get me started on New York's transfats ban.
> >
> > Danny
> >
> > --
> > http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves   - -
> search://"Daniel Reeves"
> >
> > "In science it often happens that scientists say, 'You know that's
> > a really good argument; my position is mistaken,' and then they
> > would actually change their minds and you never hear that old view
> > from them again. They really do it. It doesn't happen as often as
> > it should, because scientists are human and change is sometimes
> > painful. But it happens every day. I cannot recall the last time
> > something like that happened in politics or religion."
> >    -- Carl Sagan, 1987 CSICOP Keynote Address
> >
>
>