X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.0-r431796 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id kA2H53nw006388 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:05:04 -0500 Received: from ghostbusters.mr.itd.umich.edu (ghostbusters.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.93.144]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA2H50HK021490; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:05:00 -0500 Received: FROM smtp.eecs.umich.edu (smtp.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.43]) BY ghostbusters.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 454A2539.83B8E.28569 ; 2 Nov 2006 12:04:57 -0500 Received: from columbus.eecs.umich.edu (columbus.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.24]) by smtp.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA2H4ua8003780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:04:56 -0500 Received: from columbus.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) by columbus.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.7/8.13.0) with ESMTP id kA2H4tmd008153; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:04:56 -0500 Received: from localhost (ntclark Æ localhost) by columbus.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) with ESMTP id kA2H4tgL008150; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:04:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <3F4D88A7-A906-4379-9408-7B08456393B8 Æ umich.edu> <2ff07e720611011905s67212efbp3235bb19f5530ab4 Æ mail.gmail.com> <2ff07e720611020626j1369fef8h1fb1b0f64017b195 Æ mail.gmail.com> <8d3580670611020703wc597196id5049d2775bc100f Æ mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r431796 (2006-08-16) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:04:55 -0500 (EST) To: Kevin Lochner cc: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Nate Clark Subject: Re: more user-friendly archives Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 833 On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Kevin Lochner wrote: > we can just have a rule that no one links to the board from any of their > web-pages, then it's not reachable by google or whoever. > This never works. The fact that many of you recieve this email via gmail addresses means the archive has likely already been indexed. > we could also password-protect the board. > Seems like a good idea.