X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=3.2.0-r431796 Sender: -2.2 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id kA2ERCnw031771 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:27:12 -0500 Received: from dave.mr.itd.umich.edu (mx.umich.edu [141.211.14.131]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA2ER7M3002262; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:27:07 -0500 Received: FROM nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) BY dave.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 454A0019.7928.30564 ; 2 Nov 2006 09:26:33 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id q29so1159537nfc for ; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:26:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=CAebnAYgnyyw/Nn8L2m3UZqbPp9N5x06IuFMUCnK+f7+jJaqobadDEhE6OnEY/MI8YPfEtQJNsFI6rFuA+c2px10O/1QLewu+SwOiZ0suYwi03tBoVl3jKT3P86wDjAygLR1hr6EGGN+DrnLEsgyhAvqc6MrBYlIA114/8x887Y= Received: by 10.49.8.15 with SMTP id l15mr5698982nfi.1162477592197; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:26:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.11.13 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:26:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2ff07e720611020626j1369fef8h1fb1b0f64017b195 Æ mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2ff07e720611011905s67212efbp3235bb19f5530ab4 Æ mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6254_11750819.1162477592130" References: <3F4D88A7-A906-4379-9408-7B08456393B8 Æ umich.edu> <2ff07e720611011905s67212efbp3235bb19f5530ab4 Æ mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r431796 (2006-08-16) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:26:32 -0500 To: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: "Clare Dibble" Subject: more user-friendly archives Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 830 ------=_Part_6254_11750819.1162477592130 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Rob did a nice job making sense of the last two years of conversation, but it made me think twice about what is public about my views. Did any of you have the same reaction? I believe everything I have said and my posts don't seem to be embarrassing in any context I can currently imagine. But things can be taken out of context. As a place to hone our ideas and a forum for free discussion, I feel hesitant to have potential employers or dates (if this had been around back when I was dating) or other people I might know casually know opinions on deep and sensitive subjects without me knowing they even found it. Bloggers seem to think sharing is the way to go, but many others don't participate precisely because they can't control what happens to the information once it is out in cyberspace. In the age of google (and yahoo, Danny), is the internet a safe place to develop a social conscience? Clare On 11/1/06, Robert Felty wrote: > > Danny has been keeping archives of all the improvetheworld messages > since the beginning (almost 2 years ago now), but they have been in a > very inaccessible format (just one big text file). Danny gave me the > challenge of making them more accessible, so I would now like to > point you to the new archive: > http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves/improvetheworld/archives > > Now if you would like to find something clever that one of the > members once wrote, it should be much easier. Please let me know if > you have any problems using it. One TODO item is to add search > functionality, so be on the lookout for that in the not too distant > future. > > Enjoy. > > Rob (improving improvetheworld) > > -- > Robert Felty http://www-personal.umich.edu/~robfelty > > "Holy kleenex, Batman! It was right under our nose and we > blew it!" -- Robin > > > ------=_Part_6254_11750819.1162477592130 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Rob did a nice job making sense of the last two years of conversation, but it made me think twice about what is public about my views.  Did any of you have the same reaction? 

I believe everything I have said and my posts don't seem to be embarrassing in any context I can currently imagine.  But things can be taken out of context.  As a place to hone our ideas and a forum for free discussion, I feel hesitant to have potential employers or dates (if this had been around back when I was dating) or other people I might know casually know opinions on deep and sensitive subjects without me knowing they even found it.  Bloggers seem to think sharing is the way to go, but many others don't participate precisely because they can't control what happens to the information once it is out in cyberspace. In the age of google (and yahoo, Danny), is the internet a safe place to develop a social conscience? 

Clare


On 11/1/06, Robert Felty <robfelty Æ umich.edu> wrote:
Danny has been keeping archives of all the improvetheworld messages
since the beginning (almost 2 years ago now), but they have been in a
very inaccessible format (just one big text file). Danny gave me the
challenge of making them more accessible, so I would now like to
point you to the new archive:
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves/improvetheworld/archives

Now if you would like to find something clever that one of the
members once wrote, it should be much easier. Please let me know if
you have any problems using it. One TODO item is to add search
functionality, so be on the lookout for that in the not too distant
future.

Enjoy.

Rob (improving improvetheworld)

--
Robert Felty http://www-personal.umich.edu/~robfelty

"Holy kleenex, Batman! It was right under our nose and we
blew it!" -- Robin



------=_Part_6254_11750819.1162477592130--