X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS  	autolearn=ham version=3.2.0-r431796
Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE
Return-Path: <improvetheworld-errors &AElig umich.edu>
Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k9E1V4nw015006 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) 	for <dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:31:04 -0400
Received: from madman.mr.itd.umich.edu (madman.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.14.75]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9E1V27K024336; 	Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:31:02 -0400
Received: FROM newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	BY madman.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 45303DD1.E7145.2231 ;  	13 Oct 2006 21:30:57 -0400
Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (boston.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.61]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9E1UsLU024315 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); 	Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:30:55 -0400
Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k9E1Usnw014966 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); 	Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:30:54 -0400
Received: from localhost (dreeves &AElig localhost) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id k9E1UsFX014962; 	Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:30:54 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: boston.eecs.umich.edu: dreeves owned process doing -bs
X-X-Sender: dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu
In-Reply-To: <20061014010644.77190.qmail &AElig web81602.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610132108270.22802 &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>
References: <20061014010644.77190.qmail &AElig web81602.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r431796 (2006-08-16) on  	newman.eecs.umich.edu
X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS
X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:30:53 -0400 (EDT)
To: Melanie Reeves <melzafish &AElig sbcglobal.net>
cc: improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu
From: Daniel Reeves <dreeves &AElig umich.edu>
Subject: Re: food poll - reply with a single number
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                 
X-UID: 806

Let's put it this way:

2 = you only eat meat, plus maybe a multivitamin to avoid getting scurvy.

1.75 = most unhealthy imaginable diet, lots of junk food, no veggies.

1.5 = meat a staple of every meal.

1.25 = meat a staple of at least one meal a day.

1 = pure omnivore, don't seek meat but don't avoid.  Meatless days happen.

0.75 = Meatless days may happen on purpose.  Halfway to being vegetarian.

0.5 = Vegetarian (no meat, dairy and eggs ok).

0.25 = Halfway between vegetarian and vegan.

0 = Erica O'Connor.


Just reply if above changes your answers.


--- \/   FROM Melanie Reeves AT 06.10.13 18:06 (Today)   \/ ---

> I'm the same as Cam and Dad, a 1.  I didn't think "seek out meat" meant 
> you DIDN'T seek out veggies, grains, etc just as much, but that's the 
> way Dad and Cam are looking at it.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: cameron wicklow <ckwicklow &AElig sbcglobal.net>
> To: Melanie Reeves <melzafish &AElig sbcglobal.net>; Daniel Reeves <dreeves &AElig umich.edu>; improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 2:35:55 PM
> Subject: Re: food poll - reply with a single number
>
>
> 1
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Melanie Reeves <melzafish &AElig sbcglobal.net>
> To: Daniel Reeves <dreeves &AElig umich.edu>; improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:08:24 AM
> Subject: Re: food poll - reply with a single number
>
>
> 1.5
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Daniel Reeves <dreeves &AElig umich.edu>
> To: improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 12:34:47 PM
> Subject: food poll - reply with a single number
>
>
> (Iff you want to explain your answer, first reply with a single number,
> then reply again with number + explanation.)
>
> If you had to assign yourself a number from 0 to 2 with 0 for strict
> vegan, 1/2 for vegetarian, 1 for pure omnivore, and 2 if you
> religiously avoid fruits and vegetables, what number describes you?
>
> If you seek out meat for most meals, put yourself at least a little
> above 1.
>
> I'll go with 0.7.
>
>

-- 
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves  - -  search://"Daniel Reeves"

Entropy isn't what it used to be.