X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE autolearn=no version=3.2.0-r431796 Sender: -2.4 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k9C0gJnw031505 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:42:20 -0400 Received: from eyewitness.mr.itd.umich.edu (eyewitness.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.93.142]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9C0gGBc013014 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:42:16 -0400 Received: FROM ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) BY eyewitness.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 452D8F49.DEF94.15746 ; 11 Oct 2006 20:41:46 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 36so226540uga for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:41:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iikQ86/tMFPaHKFx/2mxrzfjg+OfGswi01xU+JyKFc2P3V03L7Y+1XyVCFG9s4e+BrAvoMcfRyyKeGlaMqowYpkdvAD1HXL4kVjTPVjBwIfyaBezL1wWswFJQwh7bVx0zUdBav/bj+lIS6j6Q8ZjTzjkm3ENMw/PEmYkjyZqBGI= Received: by 10.67.105.19 with SMTP id h19mr1839077ugm; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.222.4 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5ed707a10610111741q5f18ab70g866d66d29949c31a Æ mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <16A13BB5-D1C6-4D82-85DA-ECC1482A9DDF Æ mac.com> <2ff07e720610111543q12b268fcx231c1ca3647af40f Æ mail.gmail.com> <0F2DC08C-EE88-4E78-881A-7A4F561CDB1A Æ umich.edu> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r431796 (2006-08-16) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:41:44 -0400 To: "Daniel Reeves" Cc: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: "bethany soule" Subject: Re: food poll - reply with a single number Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 786 .6 On 10/11/06, Daniel Reeves wrote: > 14 responses so far... Keep 'em coming. > I'll compile the statistics -- interesting distribution of answers. > > No need to reply-to-all. If you *don't* want your answer revealed > publicly though, let me know, else I'll assume you don't mind. > > > > --- \/ FROM Robert Felty AT 06.10.11 18:55 (Today) \/ --- > > > .1 > > On Oct 11, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Clare Dibble wrote: > > > >> 0.99 > >> > >> On 10/11/06, Joshua J Estelle wrote: > >>> > >>> 0.35 > >>> -- > >>> Joshua J Estelle > >>> http://www.joshestelle.com > >>> josh Æ joshestelle.com > >>> jestelle Æ mac.com > >>> (734) 945-6331 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Oct 11, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Daniel Reeves wrote: > >>> > >>> (Iff you want to explain your answer, first reply with a single number, > >>> then reply again with number + explanation.) > >>> > >>> If you had to assign yourself a number from 0 to 2 with 0 for strict > >>> vegan, 1/2 for vegetarian, 1 for pure omnivore, and 2 if you > >>> religiously avoid fruits and vegetables, what number describes you? > >>> > >>> If you seek out meat for most meals, put yourself at least a little > >>> above 1. > >>> > >>> I'll go with 0.7. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" > >>> > >>> If you're a young Mafia gangster out on your first date, I > >>> bet it's really embarrassing if someone tries to kill you. > >>> -- Jack Handey > >>> > >>> > > > > -- > http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" > > Anthropologist: What's the most important thing to get > right when you do a rain dance? > Indian Chief: Timing. > -- submitted by Terence Kelly, 2003-04-16 > >