X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.0-r431796 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k9BN4Lnw026574 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:04:21 -0400 Received: from madman.mr.itd.umich.edu (madman.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.14.75]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9BN4Kw5021939; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:04:20 -0400 Received: FROM newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) BY madman.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 452D786F.ECC9B.10058 ; 11 Oct 2006 19:04:16 -0400 Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (boston.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.61]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9BN4DV8021913 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:04:14 -0400 Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k9BN4Dnw026569 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:04:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (dreeves Æ localhost) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id k9BN4D7J026566 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:04:13 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: boston.eecs.umich.edu: dreeves owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: dreeves Æ boston.eecs.umich.edu In-Reply-To: <0F2DC08C-EE88-4E78-881A-7A4F561CDB1A Æ umich.edu> Message-ID: References: <16A13BB5-D1C6-4D82-85DA-ECC1482A9DDF Æ mac.com> <2ff07e720610111543q12b268fcx231c1ca3647af40f Æ mail.gmail.com> <0F2DC08C-EE88-4E78-881A-7A4F561CDB1A Æ umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r431796 (2006-08-16) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:04:13 -0400 (EDT) To: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Daniel Reeves Subject: Re: food poll - reply with a single number Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 784 14 responses so far... Keep 'em coming. I'll compile the statistics -- interesting distribution of answers. No need to reply-to-all. If you *don't* want your answer revealed publicly though, let me know, else I'll assume you don't mind. --- \/ FROM Robert Felty AT 06.10.11 18:55 (Today) \/ --- > .1 > On Oct 11, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Clare Dibble wrote: > >> 0.99 >> >> On 10/11/06, Joshua J Estelle wrote: >>> >>> 0.35 >>> -- >>> Joshua J Estelle >>> http://www.joshestelle.com >>> josh Æ joshestelle.com >>> jestelle Æ mac.com >>> (734) 945-6331 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 11, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Daniel Reeves wrote: >>> >>> (Iff you want to explain your answer, first reply with a single number, >>> then reply again with number + explanation.) >>> >>> If you had to assign yourself a number from 0 to 2 with 0 for strict >>> vegan, 1/2 for vegetarian, 1 for pure omnivore, and 2 if you >>> religiously avoid fruits and vegetables, what number describes you? >>> >>> If you seek out meat for most meals, put yourself at least a little >>> above 1. >>> >>> I'll go with 0.7. >>> >>> -- >>> http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" >>> >>> If you're a young Mafia gangster out on your first date, I >>> bet it's really embarrassing if someone tries to kill you. >>> -- Jack Handey >>> >>> > -- http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" Anthropologist: What's the most important thing to get right when you do a rain dance? Indian Chief: Timing. -- submitted by Terence Kelly, 2003-04-16