X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS  	autolearn=ham version=3.2.0-r431796
Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE
Return-Path: <improvetheworld-errors &AElig umich.edu>
Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k7VMNrnw008195 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) 	for <dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:23:54 -0400
Received: from workinggirl.mr.itd.umich.edu (workinggirl.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.93.143]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7VMNpPT029043; 	Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:23:51 -0400
Received: FROM newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	BY workinggirl.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 44F76170.BBC0B.19407 ;  	31 Aug 2006 18:23:44 -0400
Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (boston.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.61]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7VMNggu029005 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); 	Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:23:43 -0400
Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k7VMNgnw008190 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); 	Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:23:42 -0400
Received: from localhost (dreeves &AElig localhost) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id k7VMNfDt008187; 	Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:23:41 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: boston.eecs.umich.edu: dreeves owned process doing -bs
X-X-Sender: dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu
In-Reply-To: <44F73207.BC23E9EB &AElig wayne.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608311814090.30087 &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>
References: <20060830051236.75372.qmail &AElig web81610.mail.mud.yahoo.com>      <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608300206480.30087 &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu> <44F5DF1E.45D1F3F3 &AElig wayne.edu>    <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608301527530.30087 &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>  <44F6F5CB.F07447C3 &AElig wayne.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608311401320.30087 &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>  <44F73207.BC23E9EB &AElig wayne.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r431796 (2006-08-16) on  	newman.eecs.umich.edu
X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS
X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:23:41 -0400 (EDT)
To: Andrew Reeves <andrew.reeves &AElig wayne.edu>
cc: improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu
From: Daniel Reeves <dreeves &AElig umich.edu>
Subject: Re: Yootles, Capitalism, Futarchy
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 725

When prefaced with "one" it has the second meaning.

Thoughts on Futarchy as an alternative to Democracy?


--- \/   FROM Andrew Reeves AT 06.08.31 15:01 (Today)   \/ ---

> The reason for the different impression between "man" and "Caucasian"
> is simple. Caucasian is a special designation CREATED for the purpose
> to set off persons belonging to it from other persons. There is nothing
> bigoted in that; it is a legitimate scientific expression as a variety
> of Human. "Man" on the other hand was not coined for the purpose of
> offsetting the sexes; it is the translation of the Latin Homo which is
> the name of the species we belong to. Just how it came that it acquired
> a second meaning to designate the male gender I can't tell you, but it
> is certainly not the only instance of words having two meanings. It
> seems we already had an e-mail debate on this years ago.

-- 
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves  - -  search://"Daniel Reeves"