| Message Number: | 465 |
| From: | James W Mickens <jmickens Æ eecs.umich.edu> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:53:34 -0400 (EDT) |
| Subject: | Re: stupid feel-good "no liquids" rule |
> Back to Nate and Danny's ideas. I for one would rather not > have security in airports whatsoever. I would be plenty happy > to take my chances. I don't think that every plane would > suddenly start blowing up. I strongly disagree. By your own analysis, "there are lots of people who hate the U.S." and will do organizations like Hamas "a favor by harming the evil U.S." If this is true, it couldn't possibly be the case that our airplanes would be reasonably safe with no security at our airports. In fact, we can almost be certain that there would be a huge upswing in terrorists attacks, if only because Bin Laden is on the record as saying that he *wants* to hit us again. Every one of the Bin Laden tapes contains ominous warnings about future attacks. He is not being sarcastic. In conjunction with addressing the root causes of terrorism, we have to protect ourselves against the people who already hate us now. We must be realistic about the dangers that face us. The British, American, and Pakistani intelligence agencies just broke up a major terrorist plot against airliners. This is the context for the entire conversation that we're having now. The threat is real. ~j

