X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.0-r372567 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k6P3656V031344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:06:06 -0400 Received: from guys.mr.itd.umich.edu (guys.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.14.76]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6P364b7029739; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:06:04 -0400 Received: FROM newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) BY guys.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 44C58A72.9A7EB.8326 ; 24 Jul 2006 23:05:22 -0400 Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (boston.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.61]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6P35KE9029549 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:05:20 -0400 Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k6P35J6V031329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:05:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (dreeves Æ localhost) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id k6P35JAL031326; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:05:19 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: boston.eecs.umich.edu: dreeves owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: dreeves Æ boston.eecs.umich.edu In-Reply-To: <56e157e80607241948m7b0a244bm8b83471b34514a29 Æ mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <56e157e80607241948m7b0a244bm8b83471b34514a29 Æ mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r372567 (2006-01-26) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:05:19 -0400 (EDT) To: Christine Kapusky cc: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Daniel Reeves Subject: Re: Smokefree U.S. Capitol Petition Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 631 Most of the rest of the Northeast, and all of Washington DC, is smoke-free already. Except for the United States Capitol Building. This just typifies our government's above-the-law attitude. Honestly, I'm not bothering to write to any representatives about it or sign any petitions. If they want to hasten their own deaths and those who work for them, I'm prefectly fine with that. --- \/ FROM Christine Kapusky AT 06.07.24 22:48 (Today) \/ --- > More Signatures Needed on Smokefree U.S. Capitol Petition > > **U.S. Surgeon General Richard Carmona released a report on June 27 > declaring that there is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke and > that special ventilation or separation of smokers from nonsmokers is not > enough to protect public health; the only way to provide adequate protection > is to eliminate smoking altogether. Release of the report came as we pushed > to make the U.S. Capitol and congressional office buildings smokefree. 5,630 > Lung Association Advocates have signed our Smokefree Capitol petition to > congressional leaders. We need 10,000 signatures before we can send the > petition to Capitol Hill. *Click > here*to support a Smokefree > Capitol. > -- http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" Admiration, n.: Our polite recognition of another's resemblance to ourselves. -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"