X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.0-r372567 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4J3h0XO024431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 23:43:01 -0400 Received: from dave.mr.itd.umich.edu (dave.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.14.70]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4J3gwiX024809; Thu, 18 May 2006 23:42:58 -0400 Received: FROM newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) BY dave.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 446D3EBF.E2ACF.5875 ; 18 May 2006 23:42:55 -0400 Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (boston.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.61]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4J3grdr024780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 23:42:53 -0400 Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4J3grXO024419 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 23:42:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (dreeves Æ localhost) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id k4J3gqfh024416 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 23:42:53 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: boston.eecs.umich.edu: dreeves owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: dreeves Æ boston.eecs.umich.edu Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r372567 (2006-01-26) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 23:42:52 -0400 (EDT) To: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Daniel Reeves Subject: feminism debate's swan song Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 464 I said I'd take this off the whiteboard and archive it. That's what this email is doing. The improvetheworld archives (including this message) are available at http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves/improvetheworld/archives.txt which is useless for web-browsing but you could import that file into your mail client and browse it that way (it's a standard unix/pine mail folder). Now that I work for Yahoo maybe I can come up with a better solution than that! From the whiteboard: Feminism Debate [this will be taken off the whiteboard and archived soon] Last Straw Poll: What label do you use for yourself with respect to the feminist movement? Radical feminist: Victoria, Michelle, Augie, Danny (insomuch as I try to subvert the dominant gender paradigm) Liberal feminist: Danny, Clare, Angela Feminist: Kapoo, Lisa, Bethany, Victoria, Michelle, Augie, Danny, Josh, Clare Pro-feminist: Ian (I feel all alone in the category) Sex-positive feminist: Kevin L, Danny (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-sex_feminism) Not a feminist but not *not* feminist: Martin (Danny's dad), Rachel, John (Kapoo's dad) Depends: Eugene, Dave(I want definitions before I commit) Other: Monica, Melanie, James, Laurie (really, I think if you share the goals of the feminist movement you should have the labia to identify yourself with it --anonymous coward) For the ERA: Danny, Victoria, the state of michigan, Laurie, Michelle, Rachel, Clare, Rob Against the ERA: jerry falwell, george bush, the state of illinois (!) Things we can do: 1. ratify the ERA 2. subvert the dominant gender paradigm 3. get more females in the sciences through affirmative action 4. speak out against unfair gender stereotypes and discrimination 5. insist on Ms. instead of Mrs. or Miss 6. fight against the catholic church 7. elect a female president 8. use nonsexist language (singular they, shun "you guys", shun gender-specific labels) 9. increase daycare options and/or minimum wage 10. rebel against chivalry (males: don't do it. females: react to it by actively reciprocating) 11. Emily's List (http://www.emilyslist.org) Why you might shy away from the label "feminist": 4. The best way to eliminate the oppression of women and insure social fairness and equality of the sexes is for the whole world to be 'gender blind', just as the best way to eliminate racism is for the whole world to be 'color blind'. [Who said that? I (Danny) agree but I think it's a pretty radical idea! In any case I don't remotely see it as a reason to not call oneself a feminist since feminism describes the movement that has gotten us the progress we've seen so far.] 5. worry that it alienates potential recruits from the political center 6. it sounds radical 7. people might think you advocate raising only test tube babies 8. don't want anyone to think you're a lesbian 9. Pat Robertson might blame you for terrorist attacks 10. believe that labels are categorically bad DEFINITIONS: Feminism: the radical notion that women are people Liberal Feminism: make women equal, focus on changing laws and opportunities Radical Feminism: turn social institutions upside down -- http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves"