X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k15M5gma002485 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:05:42 -0500 Received: from dave.mr.itd.umich.edu (dave.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.14.70]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k15M5eca024878; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:05:40 -0500 Received: FROM exprod7og3.obsmtp.com (exprod7og3.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.123]) BY dave.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 43E676B1.D5DBE.15606 ; 5 Feb 2006 17:05:38 -0500 Received: from source ([134.173.151.206]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob3.obsmtp.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 14:05:36 PST Received: from SCR_GWIA_DOM-MTA by SCRNCS1.scrippscollege.edu with Novell_GroupWise; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 14:05:36 -0800 Message-Id: <43E60615020000E30000EF8F Æ SCRNCS1.scrippscollege.edu> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by boston.eecs.umich.edu id k15M5gma002485 Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 14:05:09 -0800 To: , From: "Eva Revesz" Subject: Re: view the infamous cartoons, support free speech, buy legos Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 385 Hello, Uluc! I complete agree with your stance on this. Not worth getting all worked up over, either way. Hope all is well with you. Best, Trixie >>> Uluc Saranli >>> Well, realistically, I don't think doing it this way will go very far in improving the world. My reaction to this will not be from a religious standpoint, but a psychological one. As some of you know, I am by no means a religious person (despite the *very* useful indication of "Islam" as my religion on my Turkish ID :)) so I don't personally care any depictions of any prohet in any way. Back to my take on this. The worst way to convince somebody on a topic is to spit on their face, tell them their mother is a bad woman and start loudly calling them names. Except a few people who are exceptionally mature and calm, this will almost surely get you some sort of physically or verbally violent reaction in response. Don't get me wrong, I am not trying to justify any of the bombings or the obviously stupid reaction of the muslims, but as the "defenders of all things good", I would think the west could have been a bit more knowledgeable about basic human nature. To me, this whole episode about cartoons seriously feels like a primary-school kid fight than an intelligent exchange about free-speech or religious rights or any meaningful topic. And this partially includes your excited posting of the cartoons on your web page, Dan. This is not to say that censoring is ok and we 5A5Ashould be intimidated by terrorist actions. So, in that sense, it's great you can, and did post them up. However, from a practical perspective, this will achieve very little to further our cause of improving the world since it is an action which conveniently ignores the personalities of the very people you are hoping to change. You can either get all worked up about the Muslim reaction to this and take silly actions in the name of free-speech to infuriate them further, or you can sit down and think of constructive ways of inducing change. Constructive criticism and creative solutions to dealing with immature idiots are very hard to construct. It saddens me that we, as people who claim to know how to improve this world, cannot go beyond participating in the cat-fight. Your discussions on radical/constructive feminism was not conclusive on this either, so I don't expect there to be consensus this time around. So, bring on the flame! (you can call me names, it's ok :)) - Uluc. On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Daniel Reeves wrote: > And by the way, I'm completely serious about this. I think this is a way that > improvetheworld can literally improve the world. > > Also, please don't be shy about chiming in on this. Once the first message > is sent it's really no more burden for people to delete the whole thread (as > long as you leave the subject line intact). > > > (PS, I can see from the web logs that lots of you have viewed the pictures > already so don't pretend you're not listening! :) > > > --- \/ FROM Daniel Reeves AT 06.02.04 17:03 (Today) \/ --- > >> A Danish newspaper recently published cartoons depicting Mohammed and >> muslims as terrorists. Muslims are up in arms about it. In fact, they've >> burnt down the Danish and Norwegian embassies in Syria, as a start. >> >> It's all over the news but no US newspaper has the backbone to print the >> cartoons. I guess terrorism works. So this is an opportunity to fight for >> free speech by helping make sure the agenda of the radical religious right >> backfires. And so, improvetheworld brings you: >> >> http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves/itw/mohammed >> (or google improvetheworld) >> >> Oh, and since muslims are calling for boycotts of Danish products in >> response to those cartoons, you should also buy more Danish stuff. Like >> Legos. >> >> , >> Danny > > -- > http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" >