X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY  	autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE
Return-Path: <improvetheworld-errors &AElig umich.edu>
Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jAMJD3S8007618 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) 	for <dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:13:04 -0500
Received: from guys.mr.itd.umich.edu (guys.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.14.76]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAMJD1W2013461; 	Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:13:01 -0500
Received: FROM boston.eecs.umich.edu (boston.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.61]) 	BY guys.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 43836DB3.5C693.5309 ;  	22 Nov 2005 14:12:51 -0500
Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jAMJCnS8007615 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); 	Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:12:50 -0500
Received: from localhost (dreeves &AElig localhost) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id jAMJCnAb007612; 	Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:12:49 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: boston.eecs.umich.edu: dreeves owned process doing -bs
X-X-Sender: dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu
In-Reply-To: <437E2D72.2080002 &AElig eecs.umich.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511221353190.16188 &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511181319430.16188 &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>  <437E2D72.2080002 &AElig eecs.umich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on  	newman.eecs.umich.edu
X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:12:48 -0500 (EST)
To: anthony nicholson <tonynich &AElig eecs.umich.edu>
cc: improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu, Jeffrey S Cox <jeffcox &AElig umich.edu>,         Terence Kelly <tpkelly &AElig eecs.umich.edu>
From: Daniel Reeves <dreeves &AElig umich.edu>
Subject: Re: improving google
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 341

I really appreciate everyone's help (Kevin, Tony, Bill, Monica, Bethany, 
Chris, Gabe, Karen, Terence, and Jeff in particular).
Google rescheduled the interview for 6pm (eastern) tonight.

I'm continuing to brainstorm here if anyone's interested:
   http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves/wb/job

Thanks again!  Y'all are awesome.

Dan(ny)

--- \/   FROM anthony nicholson AT 05.11.18 14:37 (Friday)   \/ ---

> As a first step, go to http://userscripts.org. This is a repository of 
> customization scripts made to work with the "Greasemonkey" plugin for Firefox 
> (http://greasemonkey.mozdev.org/).
>
> There are 108 that change how google works, and another 43 or so for google 
> maps. Some of them are unbelievably useful. But then again they might be 
> aware of all this stuff already.
>
> -anthony-
>
> Daniel Reeves wrote:
>> Google has improving the world explicitly in its mission statement which is 
>> my rationalization for why I'm not just exploiting this list for my own 
>> selfish purposes in writing this:
>> 
>> Could you all help me brainstorm ideas for improving Google, to prepare for 
>> my interview with them on Monday, 6pm eastern?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Danny
>> 
>> ps, new rule: any off-topic email has to at least have an on-topic 
>> postscript.  (I was wracking my brain for such a postscript until I 
>> realized that this itself qualifies!)  And by the way, since it's easy to 
>> delete a whole thread of email that you're not interested in, don't worry 
>> too much about whether your reply is of fully general interest (as long as 
>> you don't change the subject line).  Do worry about that for starting a new 
>> topic, of course, but even then, as long as your subject line is 
>> descriptive, it's ok to target a small subset of the group.  (I'm just 
>> throwing general guidelines out there -- basically, keep doing what you've 
>> been doing; it's working fine so far!)
>> 
>> 
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:55:33 -0800
>> To: dreeves &AElig umich.edu
>> From: Louise  <louisei &AElig google.com>
>> Subject: Google
>> 
>> Hi Daniel
>> 
>> Great speaking to you.
>> 
>> I have scheduled you for a technical phone interview on 11/21 at 3pm PST.
>> Please let me know if you have conflicts.
>> 
>> Some helpful tips in preparing for your phone interview:
>> 
>> Consider ways that Google could improve.
>> 
>> Consider the most difficult bug you've encountered/ fixed.
>> 
>> Talk through your solutions, as this can help the interviewer to asses your
>> thought process and/ or approach
>> 
>> Visit Google Labs  <http://labs.google.com/> http://labs.google.com/
>> 
>> Thanks and good luck.
>> 
>> Louise
>> 
>> Louise Gray Irwin
>> Recruiter
>> Google, Inc.
>> 
>> 650-623-5177
>> louise &AElig google.com
>

-- 
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves  - -  google://"Daniel Reeves"

Smile!  It makes people think you're listening.
   -- Submitted anonymously on 2000-11-06