X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.0 Sender: -1.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jA703hS8026979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:03:44 -0500 Received: from galaxyquest.mr.itd.umich.edu (galaxyquest.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.93.145]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA703gll024736; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:03:43 -0500 Received: FROM ojibwe.web.itd.umich.edu (ojibwe.web.itd.umich.edu [141.211.144.146]) BY galaxyquest.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 436E99DA.36E1C.32135 ; 6 Nov 2005 19:03:38 -0500 Received: (from www Æ localhost) by ojibwe.web.itd.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) id jA703b1Q017136; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:03:37 -0500 Received: from jaxiest.student.umd.edu (jaxiest.student.umd.edu [129.2.147.159]) by web.mail.umich.edu (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:03:37 -0500 Message-ID: <20051106190337.onj0ypjwxwc8okog Æ web.mail.umich.edu> References: <572acfa2564.436e36f3 Æ hilltop.bradley.edu> <20051106113840.7lw22esvdw4gs40c Æ web.mail.umich.edu> <436E496B.8C1EAD76 Æ wayne.edu> In-Reply-To: <436E496B.8C1EAD76 Æ wayne.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) X-Remote-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6 X-IMP-Server: 141.211.144.230 X-Originating-IP: 129.2.147.159 X-Originating-User: mjste X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:03:37 -0500 To: Andrew Reeves Cc: lreeves Æ hilltop.bradley.edu, Daniel Reeves , James Mickens , improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: mjste Æ umich.edu Subject: Re: are you a feminist? Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 291 Hi Grandpa Andrew, I've always enjoyed your comments, but I have to say that I think that I didn't find your comments very constructive. You are, of course, free to disagree with me, but simply calling my statements as idiotic is not productive or useful in furthering the debate-- just hurtful. As I was noteably corrected, Catherine McKinnon didn't say all sex is rape, though to discuss sex without recognizing the inherent power dynamic is a bit naive, if you ask me. But more relevant, if you would like the basis of my comments, here are some: Check out this quote from a recovering anorexic: "In describing what caused her to starve herself, Lasser doesn't talk at all about body image or wanting to be stylishly thin. For her, it was more about a little girl who felt she would be less of a burden if she ate less food and took up less space. Control was also an issue. As a child she felt the best way to exercise control was in deciding if she would eat or not eat. Mostly, she chose the latter." For more information, you can see http://www.eating.ucdavis.edu. If you have a reason to dismiss my comments, I welcome them. But name-calling degenerates discourse rather than furthers it. Michelle Quoting Andrew Reeves : > Grandson Danny knows that I am, by nature, a COLLECTOR and my latest > hobby is to collect idiotic absurdities among the arguments and maxims > that show up in this debate. No doubt the eternal first prize goes to > the quote attributed to Catherine McKinnon: "ALL SEX IS RAPE" but > Michelle Sternthal's suggestion that "the female ideal of fragile stick- > thin bodies is yet another means of encouraging women to take up less > space in the world" comes close. > Right on! Supply me more! --DANNY'S GRANDPA ANDREW > > >