| Message Number: | 207 |
| From: | robfelty <robfelty Æ umich.edu> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:27:18 -0400 |
| Subject: | Re: NYTimes.com: Behind Gold's Glitter: Torn Lands and Pointed Questions |
I have not read the article, but Clare and I have titanium rings. They are cool looking, lightweight, incredibly strong, and relatively cheap. I wonder how bad diamond mining is for the environment? Rob On Oct 25, 2005, at 12:21 PM, Daniel Reeves wrote: > Never buy anything gold. Check. > > --- \/ FROM mjste Æ umich.edu AT 05.10.25 08:46 (Today) \/ --- > >> This page was sent to you by: mjste Æ umich.edu. >> >> This article is fascinating. I would love your comments on this. Do >> you think that it is worth it? >> >> >> INTERNATIONAL | October 24, 2005 >> The Cost of Gold | 30 Tons an Ounce: Behind Gold's Glitter: Torn >> Lands and Pointed Questions By JANE PERLEZ and KIRK JOHNSON >> Much of the gold left to be mined is microscopic and is being wrung >> from the earth at enormous environmental cost. >> http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/24/international/24GOLD.html?emc=eta1 > > -- > http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - google://"Daniel Reeves" > > "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." > -- Wolfgang Pauli, on a paper submitted by a physicist colleague > > >

