X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 Sender: -2.5 (spamval) -- vgsoni Æ gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j8RFRZno026791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:27:35 -0400 Received: from galaxyquest.mr.itd.umich.edu (galaxyquest.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.93.145]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j8RFR6d5000486; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:27:06 -0400 Received: FROM zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) BY galaxyquest.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 433964A9.BFA8D.32413 ; 27 Sep 2005 11:26:33 -0400 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k1so456552nzf for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:26:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SGfa4osTwj7Uc2zJNUD57JMehg8b6bSnAH02lixvhr6ZrMBq3UUE+8gpmMmnuglh/jgOqKRFiAPPXQERFVvHRgfrRuoGTsMIFwZDKui7Zo9C8UHEP+9ksKJDayCpkfsNtqNHVFIHJzjTc5Px8umW7tuY11Ifq6NFGdDL8qdP0Po= Received: by 10.54.121.16 with SMTP id t16mr1071209wrc; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:26:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.82.4 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:26:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b4e773905092708261fee093 Æ mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Vishal Soni In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline References: <57f1bcf9e8c721f1618af727e222b935 Æ umich.edu> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by boston.eecs.umich.edu id j8RFRZno026791 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:26:33 -0400 To: Robert Felty Cc: "David Morris, PhD" , improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Vishal Soni Subject: Re: NYtimes article: Many women at elite colleges set career path to Motherhood Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 202 Although it would be good, I don't think having a law that prevents employers from firing people on maternity grounds would help. A large part of the problem is that employers see women as a liability in that they're more likely to leave then men are for their children. If, and when, they do return to the workforce, it's after a significant time gap during which they haven't been able to keep up their skill set. This is somewhat of a self-perpetuating cycle because this makes it harder for women to find jobs/promotions. I'm not sure what a good solution here is. Maybe if men took on a greater role in the early stages of child rearing, companies would see women as less of a risk. -V On 9/27/05, Robert Felty wrote: > Thanks for the comment, Dr. Dave Morris, Ph.D., > > I am plenty willing to stay at home, do laundry, cook, clean and look > after the kids while Clare makes the big bucks being an engineer. I > really think that it is best if one parent can be with the kids > pretty much full time while they are very young. My mom went back to > work when I entered 7th grade, and I think that was good for her. > > Rob > > On Sep 27, 2005, at 9:45 AM, David Morris, PhD wrote: > > > What really bothers me is not that women are planning to be stay at > > home parents, but that so few men are. I think it's good that the > > pendulum has swung back this way, and I think we'll see a > > generation of better, smarter, happier, more responsible children > > because of it. I think we need more change in that direction, > > convincing men how critical they are to good child rearing. Ideally > > both parents should cut back on their careers significantly to > > raise children. > > > > If you have two kids spaced two years apart and stay at home until > > they get into school, that's 8 years, or less than 10% of your > > life. Not a big sacrifice compared to the payoff, certainly not a > > reason not to get an excellent degree and plan a high powered > > career. Granted it's not like you can go back to working 60 hours a > > week after the kid starts 1st grade, but the problem becomes more > > tractable then, especially if you can balance child-rearing time > > with your spouse. I hate it when they make it sound like you've > > chosen to throw away your professional life because you've had > > children. It's an impediment, but it's not a binary switch, it's > > not nearly as bad as they make it out to be. > > > > In fact it should be a law in this country that you should be able > > to work down to 50% time and they're not allowed to fire you for it > > if you have kids, regardless of your gender. That would really help. > > > > Dave > > > > On Sep 26, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Bethany Soule wrote: > > > > > >> If you're interested in the current state of feminism/equality of the > >> sexes: > >> > >> http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/20/national/20women.html? > >> pagewanted=1&ex=3D1128225600 > >> > >> I'm including the article below so you can read it without having to > >> actually go to the NYTimes site, but it's going to make this e- > >> mail hugely > >> long. Sorry. > >> > >> Many Women at Elite Colleges Set Career Path to Motherhood > >> > >> By LOUISE STORY > >> Published: September 20, 2005 > >> > >> Cynthia Liu is precisely the kind of high achiever Yale wants: > >> smart (1510 > >> SAT), disciplined (4.0 grade point average), competitive (finalist in > >> Texas oratory competition), musical (pianist), athletic (runner) and > >> altruistic (hospital volunteer). And at the start of her sophomore > >> year at > >> Yale, Ms. Liu is full of ambition, planning to go to law school. > >> > >> Emily Lechner, at home in North Potomac, Md., with her mother, > >> Carol, is a > >> student at Yale who plans to become a lawyer, but who says her > >> career will > >> take a back seat once she starts having children. > >> > >> So will she join the long tradition of famous Ivy League > >> graduates? Not > >> likely. By the time she is 30, this accomplished 19-year-old > >> expects to be > >> a stay-at-home mom. > >> > >> "My mother's always told me you can't be the best career woman and > >> the > >> best mother at the same time," Ms. Liu said matter-of-factly. "You > >> always > >> have to choose one over the other." > >> > >> At Yale and other top colleges, women are being groomed to take their > >> place in an ever more diverse professional elite. It is almost > >> taken for > >> granted that, just as they make up half the students at these > >> institutions, they will move into leadership roles on an equal > >> basis with > >> their male classmates. > >> > >> There is just one problem with this scenario: many of these women > >> say that > >> is not what they want. > >> > >> Many women at the nation's most elite colleges say they have already > >> decided that they will put aside their careers in favor of raising > >> children. Though some of these students are not planning to have > >> children > >> and some hope to have a family and work full time, many others, > >> like Ms. > >> Liu, say they will happily play a traditional female role, with > >> motherhood > >> their main commitment. > >> > >> [Some readers have asked about the reporting that went into this > >> article. > >> The reporter, Louise Story, explains in a separate article > >> published Sept. > >> 23.] > >> > >> Much attention has been focused on career women who leave the work > >> force > >> to rear children. What seems to be changing is that while many > >> women in > >> college two or three decades ago expected to have full-time > >> careers, their > >> daughters, while still in college, say they have already decided to > >> suspend or end their careers when they have children. > >> > >> "At the height of the women's movement and shortly thereafter, > >> women were > >> much more firm in their expectation that they could somehow combine > >> full-time work with child rearing," said Cynthia E. Russett, a > >> professor > >> of American history who has taught at Yale since 1967. "The women > >> today > >> are, in effect, turning realistic." > >> > >> Dr. Russett is among more than a dozen faculty members and > >> administrators > >> at the most exclusive institutions who have been on campus for > >> decades and > >> who said in interviews that they had noticed the changing attitude. > >> > >> Many students say staying home is not a shocking idea among their > >> friends. > >> Shannon Flynn, an 18-year-old from Guilford, Conn., who is a > >> freshman at > >> Harvard, says many of her girlfriends do not want to work full time. > >> > >> "Most probably do feel like me, maybe even tending toward wanting > >> to not > >> work at all," said Ms. Flynn, who plans to work part time after > >> having > >> children, though she is torn because she has worked so hard in > >> school. > >> > >> "Men really aren't put in that position," she said. > >> > >> Uzezi Abugo, a freshman at the University of Pennsylvania who > >> hopes to > >> become a lawyer, says she, too, wants to be home with her children at > >> least until they are in school. > >> > >> "I've seen the difference between kids who did have their mother > >> stay at > >> home and kids who didn't, and it's kind of like an obvious > >> difference when > >> you look at it," said Ms. Abugo, whose mother, a nurse, stayed > >> home until > >> Ms. Abugo was in first grade. > >> > >> While the changing attitudes are difficult to quantify, the shift > >> emerges > >> repeatedly in interviews with Ivy League students, including 138 > >> freshman > >> and senior females at Yale who replied to e-mail questions sent to > >> members > >> of two residential colleges over the last school year. > >> > >> The interviews found that 85 of the students, or roughly 60 > >> percent, said > >> that when they had children, they planned to cut back on work or stop > >> working entirely. About half of those women said they planned to > >> work part > >> time, and about half wanted to stop work for at least a few years. > >> > >> Two of the women interviewed said they expected their husbands to > >> stay > >> home with the children while they pursued their careers. Two > >> others said > >> either they or their husbands would stay home, depending on whose > >> career > >> was furthest along. > >> > >> The women said that pursuing a rigorous college education was > >> worth the > >> time and money because it would help position them to work in > >> meaningful > >> part-time jobs when their children are young or to attain good > >> jobs when > >> their children leave home. > >> > >> In recent years, elite colleges have emphasized the important > >> roles they > >> expect their alumni - both men and women - to play in society. > >> > >> (Page 2 of 3) > >> > >> For example, earlier this month, Shirley M. Tilghman, the > >> president of > >> Princeton University, welcomed new freshmen, saying: "The goal of a > >> Princeton education is to prepare young men and women to take up > >> positions > >> of leadership in the 21st century. Of course, the word 'leadership' > >> conjures up images of presidents and C.E.O.'s, but I want to > >> stress that > >> my idea of a leader is much broader than that." > >> > >> She listed education, medicine and engineering as other areas where > >> students could become leaders. > >> > >> In an e-mail response to a question, Dr. Tilghman added: "There is > >> nothing > >> inconsistent with being a leader and a stay-at-home parent. Some > >> women > >> (and a handful of men) whom I have known who have done this have > >> had a > >> powerful impact on their communities." > >> > >> Yet the likelihood that so many young women plan to opt out of > >> high-powered careers presents a conundrum. > >> > >> "It really does raise this question for all of us and for the > >> country: > >> when we work so hard to open academics and other opportunities for > >> women, > >> what kind of return do we expect to get for that?" said Marlyn > >> McGrath > >> Lewis, director of undergraduate admissions at Harvard, who served > >> as dean > >> for coeducation in the late 1970's and early 1980's. > >> > >> It is a complicated issue and one that most schools have not > >> addressed. > >> The women they are counting on to lead society are likely to marry > >> men who > >> will make enough money to give them a real choice about whether to be > >> full-time mothers, unlike those women who must work out of economic > >> necessity. > >> > >> It is less than clear what universities should, or could, do about > >> it. For > >> one, a person's expectations at age 18 are less than perfect > >> predictors of > >> their life choices 10 years later. And in any case, admissions > >> officers > >> are not likely to ask applicants whether they plan to become stay- > >> at-home > >> moms. > >> > >> University officials said that success meant different things to > >> different > >> people and that universities were trying to broaden students' > >> minds, not > >> simply prepare them for jobs. > >> > >> "What does concern me," said Peter Salovey, the dean of Yale > >> College, "is > >> that so few students seem to be able to think outside the box; so few > >> students seem to be able to imagine a life for themselves that isn't > >> constructed along traditional gender roles." > >> > >> There is, of course, nothing new about women being more likely > >> than men to > >> stay home to rear children. > >> > >> According to a 2000 survey of Yale alumni from the classes of > >> 1979, 1984, > >> 1989 and 1994, conducted by the Yale Office of Institutional > >> Research, > >> more men from each of those classes than women said that work was > >> their > >> primary activity - a gap that was small among alumni in their 20's > >> but > >> widened as women moved into their prime child-rearing years. Among > >> the > >> alumni surveyed who had reached their 40's, only 56 percent of the > >> women > >> still worked, compared with 90 percent of the men. > >> > >> A 2005 study of comparable Yale alumni classes found that the > >> pattern had > >> not changed. Among the alumni who had reached their early 40's, > >> just over > >> half said work was their primary activity, compared with 90 > >> percent of the > >> men. Among the women who had reached their late 40's, some said > >> they had > >> returned to work, but the percentage of women working was still > >> far behind > >> the percentage of men. > >> > >> A 2001 survey of Harvard Business School graduates found that 31 > >> percent > >> of the women from the classes of 1981, 1985 and 1991 who answered the > >> survey worked only part time or on contract, and another 31 > >> percent did > >> not work at all, levels strikingly similar to the percentages of > >> the Yale > >> students interviewed who predicted they would stay at home or work > >> part > >> time in their 30's and 40's. > >> > >> What seems new is that while many of their mothers expected to have > >> hard-charging careers, then scaled back their professional plans only > >> after having children, the women of this generation expect their > >> careers > >> to take second place to child rearing. > >> > >> "It never occurred to me," Rebecca W. Bushnell, dean of the School > >> of Arts > >> and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania, said about working > >> versus > >> raising children. "Thirty years ago when I was heading out, I > >> guess I was > >> just taking it one step at a time." > >> > >> Many Women at Elite Colleges Set Career Path to Motherhood > >> > >> (Page 3 of 3) > >> > >> Dr. Bushnell said young women today, in contrast, are thinking and > >> talking > >> about part-time or flexible work options for when they have children. > >> "People have a heightened awareness of trying to get the right > >> balance > >> between work and family." > >> > >> Sarah Currie, a senior at Harvard, said many of the men in her > >> American > >> Family class last fall approved of women's plans to stay home with > >> their > >> children. > >> > >> "A lot of the guys were like, 'I think that's really great,' " Ms. > >> Currie > >> said. "One of the guys was like, 'I think that's sexy.' Staying at > >> home > >> with your children isn't as polarizing of an issue as I envision > >> it is for > >> women who are in their 30's now." > >> > >> For most of the young women who responded to e-mail questions, a > >> major > >> factor shaping their attitudes seemed to be their experience with > >> their > >> own mothers, about three out of five of whom did not work at all, > >> took > >> several years off or worked only part time. > >> > >> "My stepmom's very proud of my choice because it makes her feel more > >> valuable," said Kellie Zesch, a Texan who graduated from the > >> University of > >> North Carolina two years ago and who said that once she had > >> children, she > >> intended to stay home for at least five years and then consider > >> working > >> part time. "It justified it to her, that I don't look down on her > >> for not > >> having a career." > >> > >> Similarly, students who are committed to full-time careers, without > >> breaks, also cited their mothers as influences. Laura Sullivan, a > >> sophomore at Yale who wants to be a lawyer, called her mother's > >> choice to > >> work full time the "greatest gift." > >> > >> "She showed me what it meant to be an amazing mother and maintain a > >> career," Ms. Sullivan said. > >> > >> Some of these women's mothers, who said they did not think about > >> these > >> issues so early in their lives, said they were surprised to hear that > >> their college-age daughters had already formed their plans. > >> > >> Emily Lechner, one of Ms. Liu's roommates, hopes to stay home a > >> few years, > >> then work part time as a lawyer once her children are in school. > >> > >> Her mother, Carol, who once thought she would have a full-time > >> career but > >> gave it up when her children were born, was pleasantly surprised > >> to hear > >> that. "I do have this bias that the parents can do it best," she > >> said. "I > >> see a lot of women in their 30's who have full-time nannies, and I > >> just > >> question if their kids are getting the best." > >> > >> For many feminists, it may come as a shock to hear how unbothered > >> many > >> young women at the nation's top schools are by the strictures of > >> traditional roles. > >> > >> "They are still thinking of this as a private issue; they're > >> accepting > >> it," said Laura Wexler, a professor of American studies and > >> women's and > >> gender studies at Yale. "Women have been given full-time working > >> career > >> opportunities and encouragement with no social changes to support it. > >> > >> "I really believed 25 years ago," Dr. Wexler added, "that this > >> would be > >> solved by now." > >> > >> Angie Ku, another of Ms. Liu's roommates who had a stay-at-home > >> mom, talks > >> nonchalantly about attending law or business school, having perhaps a > >> 10-year career and then staying home with her children. > >> > >> "Parents have such an influence on their children," Ms. Ku said. > >> "I want > >> to have that influence. Me!" > >> > >> She said she did not mind if that limited her career potential. > >> > >> "I'll have a career until I have two kids," she said. "It doesn't > >> necessarily matter how far you get. It's kind of like the > >> experience: I > >> have tried what I wanted to do." > >> > >> Ms. Ku added that she did not think it was a problem that women > >> usually do > >> most of the work raising kids. > >> > >> "I accept things how they are," she said. "I don't mind the status > >> quo. I > >> don't see why I have to go against it." > >> > >> After all, she added, those roles got her where she is. > >> > >> "It worked so well for me," she said, "and I don't see in my life > >> why it > >> wouldn't work." > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > David P. Morris, PhD > > aka thecat Æ umich.edu, aka KB8PWY > > home: 734-995-5525 UofM (2104 SPRL): 734-763-5357 fax: 734-763-5567 > > ElectroDynamic Applications Inc. > > phone: (734) 786-1434 fax: (734) 786-3235 > > morris Æ edapplications.com > > > > > > > > > >