X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX18Q0XiOIsdu4KZSfI9lAXaQFbNh6QArGTc Æ newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3E3Aplj006284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:10:51 -0400 Received: from informer.mr.itd.umich.edu (informer.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.14.72]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3E33OBc026392; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:03:24 -0400 Received: FROM boston.eecs.umich.edu (boston.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.61]) BY informer.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 425DDF35.E91BD.20456 ; 13 Apr 2005 23:10:45 -0400 Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3E3Ailj006279 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:10:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (dreeves Æ localhost) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id j3E3AiYZ006276; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:10:44 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: boston.eecs.umich.edu: dreeves owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: dreeves Æ boston.eecs.umich.edu Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:10:44 -0400 (EDT) To: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu cc: Kaushal Gupta From: Daniel Reeves Subject: speech about gay rights, and civil rights in general Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 140 Below is the text of an award-winning speech by my friend Kaushal. Civil Rights, Part 2 by Kaushal Gupta "Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement, there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix." Mister Toastmaster, fellow Toastmasters and welcome guests, those are the words that the judge told Richard Loving and Mildred Jeter in 1959. Their crime? Being married. Their punishment? Banishment from the state of Virginia. Before that decision was overturned 8 years later, another couple, Curtis Woolbright and his lover, Karen, fled from Texas to California. They did this because California's Supreme Court had, in a very controversial decision, declared anti-miscegenation statutes to be unconstitutional. We hail the California decision as a victory for civil rights, as we should. But the progression of civil rights, it seems, is not without irony. You see, Curtis and Karen Woolbright now have an adult son, Curtis Woolbright, Jr. And they have to struggle for their son's right to marry today, just as they did for their own marriage decades ago. Not because their son is in love with someone of a different race, but of the same sex. Why struggle? Why do people get married anyway, when the divorce rate is so high? There are lots and lots of reasons. Spousal privilege, custody rights, property division, protection against domestic violence, hospital visitation rights, family leave benefits, joint tax filing, inheritance rights, Social Security benefits, veterans' benefits, health insurance, pensions. Did you know that according to the U.S. General Accounting Office, there are actually 1,049 Federal benefits you get just by being married? And, depending on where you live, you get all these benefits for $50 or less, the cost of the marriage license. But most couples get married without even knowing about those 1,049 benefits. They get married simply because they want to be married. It is a dream people have pursued and achieved for thousands of years. It is the reason Curtis and Karen Woolbright fled to a different state. It is an experience that they want their son to have in life. And earlier this year, they won their victory in court. Not only that: California's Supreme Court, in another very controversial decision, declared anti same-sex marriage laws to be unconstitutional. I see all this not as a radical change in our society, but as a natural continuation of the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Do you disagree? Let me tell you about another man named Bayard Rustin. He was a civil rights activist who not only helped to win equality in the South, but came to the aid of Japanese Americans who were imprisoned during World War II. He also protested on behalf of the peoples of South Africa and India who were choking under British rule. In fact, it was he who counseled Martin Luther King, Jr. on nonviolent civil disobedience. Without his influence, the March on Washington may never have happened. If you've never heard the name Bayard Rustin before, do not be surprised. Even the NAACP would not allow a gay man such as himself to receive any credit for his contributions, much to King's own regret. As I said, the progression of civil rights is not without irony. I will end this by acknowledging that many are opposed to same sex marriage due to deeply held spiritual convictions. But many same sex couples are also spiritual people, and want to be married in a church, by their pastor, with their friends, families, and God as witnesses. Whose interpretation of faith is correct? Is that a question we want our government to answer, again? "Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement, there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix." -- http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - google://"Daniel Reeves"