X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, MR_DIFF_MID,RCVD_IN_SORBS,SMILEY autolearn=no version=3.2.3 Sender: -1.1 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l8UHhvux030082 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:43:57 -0400 Received: from eyewitness.mr.itd.umich.edu (mx.umich.edu [141.211.176.131]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l8UHhIDI016288; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:43:18 -0400 Received: FROM smtp115.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com (smtp115.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com [66.196.96.88]) BY eyewitness.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 46FFE04A.4B7D3.16834 ; 30 Sep 2007 13:43:38 -0400 Received: (qmail 4640 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2007 17:43:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.185?) (kb8pwy Æ sbcglobal.net Æ 69.221.69.119 with plain) by smtp115.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Sep 2007 17:43:37 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: GLnfPK0VM1kvYDgschuUGfd7lhyK3mFPA2_X0AhUxJH0XUdR6CR3LczAWW0dyF_yHFI3wPu03zteVDmA4ak9usLMcCmnPdRSIOTp38tTNB.vL2hxSNnFgQ-- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-14-266156773 Message-Id: <1FB583EC-FBB5-4C5D-9188-60E5A3B2AE97 Æ umich.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.2, clamav-milter version 0.91.2 on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:43:57 -0400 To: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Dave Morris Subject: Re: candidate calculator --Apple-Mail-14-266156773 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed I got Mike Gravel too, with 96.30% match. Hmm. Didn't know anything about him before. I'm in favor of the improve the world voting block. I'd rather get a candidate who isn't my top choice, but avoids my bottom choice, than have all of our votes spread out amongst the best 4 candidates, causing the 5th and worst candidate to win instead. :-) But the link to the page Danny sent didn't work for me. Did that get up? I'm joining this late I know. Dave Morris cell: 734-476-8769 http://www-personal.umich.edu/~thecat/ On Sep 5, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Rob Felty wrote: > the election is still quite a ways off, but there certainly is enough > press about it. I enjoyed this little candidate calculator. It > basically just compares your answers to 23 different questions to the > views of the 16 or so democrat and republican candidates. Accordingly, > I should vote for Mike Gravel. I would be interested to hear your > results. > http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html > > Rob > > --Apple-Mail-14-266156773 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 I got Mike Gravel too, with=A096.30% match. Hmm. Didn't = know anything about him before. I'm in favor of the improve the world = voting block. I'd rather get a candidate who isn't my top choice, but = avoids my bottom choice, than have all of our votes spread out amongst = the best 4 candidates, causing the 5th and worst candidate to win = instead. :-)

But the link to the page = Danny sent didn't work for me. Did that get up? I'm joining this late I = know.

Dave = Morris
cell: 734-476-8769

On Sep = 5, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Rob Felty wrote:

the election is still quite a ways off, but there = certainly is enough
press about it. I enjoyed = this little candidate calculator. It
basically = just compares your answers to 23 different questions to=A0 the
views of the 16 or so democrat and republican = candidates. Accordingly,
I should vote = for Mike Gravel. I would be interested to hear your
results.

Rob



= --Apple-Mail-14-266156773--