X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.2.2 Sender: -1.9 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l886OMux026235 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 02:24:23 -0400 Received: from anniehall.mr.itd.umich.edu (mx.umich.edu [141.211.176.130]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l886NhQw017603 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 02:23:53 -0400 Received: FROM edinburgh.eecs.umich.edu (edinburgh.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.27]) BY anniehall.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 46E24004.24A2.30697 ; 8 Sep 2007 02:24:04 -0400 Received: from edinburgh.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) by edinburgh.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l886OKVn004777; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 02:24:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (jmickens Æ localhost) by edinburgh.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id l886OK5v004774; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 02:24:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1189103349.28315.99.camel Æ hactar> <5ed707a10709071059h59a7c6c9t733cb9e1343a3fb5 Æ mail.gmail.com> <5ed707a10709071225q3b2be676t29a903113e9506db Æ mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.2 (2007-07-23) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.2, clamav-milter version 0.91.2 on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 02:24:20 -0400 (EDT) To: Daniel Reeves cc: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: James W Mickens Subject: Re: candidate calculator > One more stab at recruiting James to the voting pact: > > Setting: A cocktail party. > > James: [performs an elaborate parlour trick] > [or maybe tells the BoyJazz story] > Alice: [swoons] [recovers] > [The conversation now turns to politics.] > Alice: So, James, who are *you* voting for? > James: Mitt Romney, to my walloping chagrin. > Alice: [buffaloed, waits with eyebrows raised] > James: See, I'm in this kind of cult and there was this pact... > Alice: [horrified fascination] > James: It's a long story, I'll point you to the relevant blog posts. > > [Later, James forwards his brilliant, cogent arguments against Romney.] > [Alice, curiosity piqued, swallows it all up, forwards to her friends, > James's candidate wins the election.] Make no mistake, my singular goal in life is to woo impressionable young women with my political acumen. But imagine how much more attractive I would seem to young Alice if I had brilliant arguments *and* I actually voted according to those arguments? I think that most women would find that attitude extremely hot, and by "that attitude," I mean "the inclination to act in the way suggested by common sense." After all, it might be difficult to explain to my future wife that I really support Candidate X, but I improve the world more by voting for some different Candidate Y who was selected using an elaborate cult-based nomination process. Don't get me wrong, if you know a woman who lives by the maxim "avoid supporting your principles through active measures," let her know that I'm single and waiting. But until that woman materializes from the ether, I think that I'll stick to voting for the candidate that I support. It's extremely entertaining that I just took credit for pledging to vote for the candidate I support. This is clearly a sign that the apocalypse is nigh. ;-) ~j