X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.2 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l885Vlux024934 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 01:31:47 -0400 Received: from serenity.mr.itd.umich.edu (mx.umich.edu [141.211.14.136]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l885VHB9011856; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 01:31:17 -0400 Received: FROM newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) BY serenity.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 46E233B6.3CAB7.10026 ; 8 Sep 2007 01:31:34 -0400 Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (boston.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.61]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l885V3dj011817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 8 Sep 2007 01:31:03 -0400 Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l885VPux024927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 8 Sep 2007 01:31:25 -0400 Received: from localhost (dreeves Æ localhost) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id l885VOoi024922; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 01:31:25 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: boston.eecs.umich.edu: dreeves owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: dreeves Æ boston.eecs.umich.edu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1189103349.28315.99.camel Æ hactar> <5ed707a10709071059h59a7c6c9t733cb9e1343a3fb5 Æ mail.gmail.com> <5ed707a10709071225q3b2be676t29a903113e9506db Æ mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.2 (2007-07-23) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.2, clamav-milter version 0.91.2 on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.2, clamav-milter version 0.91.2 on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 01:31:24 -0400 (EDT) To: James W Mickens cc: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Daniel Reeves Subject: Re: candidate calculator Sorry, I was being provocative in calling y'all socialists. I did have the impression your ideal economy would be more European than American. We disagree less than I thought, but the disagreement is still pronounced. More on that in the other thread (forthcoming)! One more stab at recruiting James to the voting pact: Setting: A cocktail party. James: [performs an elaborate parlour trick] [or maybe tells the BoyJazz story] Alice: [swoons] [recovers] [The conversation now turns to politics.] Alice: So, James, who are *you* voting for? James: Mitt Romney, to my walloping chagrin. Alice: [buffaloed, waits with eyebrows raised] James: See, I'm in this kind of cult and there was this pact... Alice: [horrified fascination] James: It's a long story, I'll point you to the relevant blog posts. [Later, James forwards his brilliant, cogent arguments against Romney.] [Alice, curiosity piqued, swallows it all up, forwards to her friends, James's candidate wins the election.] Actually, wait, this is James Mickens we're talking about. Is there really any chance he won't convince us to endorse his favorite candidate? :) Danny (adoring Mickens fan, who still thinks he has something on James when it comes to economics) PS: above applies to Trixie too! PPS: the prediction markets say that Hillary is more likely than anyone else to win the election, but that she probably won't. P3S: to Trixie: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q.E.D. GIYF! --- \/ FROM James W Mickens AT 07.09.07 20:28 (Today) \/ --- >> Who else wants to join? (You can reply to just me if you want.) >> We really need some socialists (Michelle? Dave? Trixie? James?). > > Being concerned about the negative effects of income inequality does not make > me a socialist. I have no special distrust of capitalism or market-based > systems. My ideal economy would look more American than European, and as I've > mentioned before, a certain level of income inequality is needed to encourage > our most productive citizens. However, I recognize that completely unfettered > markets optimize wealth-based metrics, not welfare-based metrics. Thus, a > basic sense of morality compels me to support government intervention when > markets fail to protect the less fortunate. This is not a socialist stance, > but a humanistic one. > > ~j > > > p.s. I will not join the endorsement pact because there is no guarantee that > the selected candidate will be the best one from my perspective. I see no > reason to cede my vote to the will of a collective that may not share my key > political beliefs. The fate-sharing aspect of the endorsement process might > encourage me to argue hard for my candidate; however, fate-sharing does not > ensure the correctness of the group's decision from my perspective, and it is > precisely my perspective which determines how I cast my vote on election day. > -- http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" "It's not easy being easy." -- The Ethical Slut