X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.2 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l85IZnux019689 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:35:50 -0400 Received: from tadpole.mr.itd.umich.edu (mx.umich.edu [141.211.14.133]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l85IZJbD006414; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:35:19 -0400 Received: FROM nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.239]) BY tadpole.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 46DEF6ED.DBEC4.9081 ; 5 Sep 2007 14:35:25 -0400 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f1so1259803nzc for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:35:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KZ4O3tYxnbK+LYteMOd4UfpO5/8BZI4t/esDRtqIeFJy8BQ0tZcV2tfu1KHJxN72WGeg2qqFZEZGZu5zKnFgGitWNxSsCzikXGZgA0bMYI6Ff5BXcbrd4tP83HIKU56GknBdRAQpwDCJBgKXLhQnkS83NonOvk87hnAMZYAMjac= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YIGdtn6SYc2UbCeVZQmNqYE9wygCBTIn7GSy2SyjLmSck8BZ4XYhJn7IZ84AL5Fj/WX06vCWJ80HC/02cietT+q2YDe70XoTSsNHkay4uLZWOu+stmq8oVsfecw2dmuBezLvHei5uAesm1q+mssbAu/PEF40Ywu4VSbt6Zs7fxs= Received: by 10.65.203.3 with SMTP id f3mr13481843qbq.1189017325403; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.157.11 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2ff07e720709051135y423738cci55b2cdcbb5a6aac0 Æ mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <582561.78990.qm Æ web81906.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <582561.78990.qm Æ web81906.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.2 (2007-07-23) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.2, clamav-milter version 0.91.2 on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:35:25 -0400 To: "Erica O'Connor" Cc: "Kevin Lochner" , "Rob Felty" , improvetheworld Æ umich.edu, "Harold Felty" , "Ellen Dibble" , Dave From: "Clare Dibble" Subject: Re: candidate calculator Is this a pro-Mike Gavel site? It says >50% of users have him as their best match, but he hasn't been winning straw polls (has he?). I got him as a 95% match. On 9/5/07, Erica O'Connor wrote: > Denny Kucinich, another vegan, what a surprise. ;-) > Fun toy, thanks! > -Erica > > --- Kevin Lochner wrote: > > > I'm also with Mike Gravel (76% match), followed by > > Dodd(70) & Biden(69). > > > > > > > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Rob Felty wrote: > > > > > the election is still quite a ways off, but there > > certainly is enough > > > press about it. I enjoyed this little candidate > > calculator. It > > > basically just compares your answers to 23 > > different questions to the > > > views of the 16 or so democrat and republican > > candidates. Accordingly, > > > I should vote for Mike Gravel. I would be > > interested to hear your > > > results. > > > http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > >