X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 	version=3.2.2
Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE
Return-Path: <improvetheworld-errors &AElig umich.edu>
Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l85IViux019536 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) 	for <dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:31:45 -0400
Received: from jeffrey.mr.itd.umich.edu (mx.umich.edu [141.211.14.132]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l85IVDkv005280; 	Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:31:13 -0400
Received: FROM srvr20.engin.umich.edu (srvr20.engin.umich.edu [141.213.75.22]) 	BY jeffrey.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 46DEF5FE.A3376.16088 ;  	 5 Sep 2007 14:31:26 -0400
Received: from smtp.engin.umich.edu (root &AElig smtp.engin.umich.edu [141.213.75.24]) 	by srvr20.engin.umich.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l85IVQqx017905; 	Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:31:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.47] (c-68-43-57-118.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.43.57.118]) 	(authenticated bits=0) 	by smtp.engin.umich.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l85IVPKH015792; 	Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:31:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <46DEF5C1.3000002 &AElig eecs.umich.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <fb769dde0709051020x77e33beby45dd50ce72d5fa77 &AElig mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709051408290.18608 &AElig oshkosh.eecs.umich.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709051408290.18608 &AElig oshkosh.eecs.umich.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.2 (2007-07-23) on 	newman.eecs.umich.edu
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.2, clamav-milter version 0.91.2 on newman.eecs.umich.edu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:30:25 -0400
To: improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu
CC: Harold Felty <hfelty &AElig wideopenwest.com>,         Ellen Dibble <ellen &AElig twinsprings.com>, Dave <dave &AElig twinsprings.com>
From: Matt Rudary <mrudary &AElig eecs.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: candidate calculator

My top match was also with Gravel, with Biden, Obama, and Kucinich 
following not far behind. According to the site, just over half of 
respondents have Gravel as their top match.

Matt

Kevin Lochner wrote:
> I'm also with Mike Gravel (76% match), followed by Dodd(70) & Biden(69).
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Rob Felty wrote:
> 
>> the election is still quite a ways off, but there certainly is enough
>> press about it. I enjoyed this little candidate calculator. It
>> basically just compares your answers to 23 different questions to  the
>> views of the 16 or so democrat and republican candidates. Accordingly,
>> I should vote for Mike Gravel. I would be interested to hear your
>> results.
>> http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html
>>
>> Rob
>>