X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.2 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l852Ieux012769 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 22:18:40 -0400 Received: from hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.81]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l852I4vj001271; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 22:18:04 -0400 Received: FROM [192.168.1.101] (146-115-123-24.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com [146.115.123.24]) BY hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 46DE11AC.F10.12482 ; 4 Sep 2007 22:17:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <924B90FC-AAD7-41B8-818E-45E70AA456D1 Æ umich.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.2 (2007-07-23) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.2, clamav-milter version 0.91.2 on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 22:17:21 -0400 To: Daniel Reeves Cc: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Michelle Sternthal Subject: Re: mind the gap I'm in the midst of dissertation woes, but I have not ignored this discussion or Danny's comments. I challenge your point, Danny, that inequality is only correlationally tied to poor health. There are causal pathways, and I will certainly dig up the evidence for you. Myriad studies have been done-- prospective, large scale, longitudinal-- that have looked at this, and they have controlled for potential confounders. My silence on this matter is not because you stumped me-- i'm just knee-deep in deadlines. So no conclusions yet! On Sep 4, 2007, at 8:04 PM, Daniel Reeves wrote: > This is what is so awesome about improvetheworld. These debates > actually *get* somewhere! Seriously, I'm excited about this. :) > > Let's pause for a straw poll: > http://dreeves.wufoo.com/forms/mind-the-gap/ > > > --- \/ FROM James W Mickens AT 07.09.04 16:51 (Today) \/ --- > >>> And I don't think you clarified what James is saying. He said >>> that more real wealth to billionaires does directly hurt poor >>> people. I'd like to hear the chain of causality he has in mind. >> >> According to Graham, "wealth is not money. Money is just a >> convenient way of trading one form of wealth for another. Wealth >> is the underlying stuff---the goods and services we buy." The >> underlying stuff, the goods and services, are constrained >> resources. For example, using a wealth resource in one way often >> prevents its use in a different way; real estate that is used to >> build a library can't be used to build a sports stadium. Wealth is >> also constrained by the rate at which it can be produced. There >> are a finite number of automobiles that can be produced per month. >> There are a finite number of hours that doctors can spend treating >> patients. These figures may improve over time, but they will still >> be finite. This means that many types of wealth are scarce. Ergo, >> distribution matters. In particular, skewed wealth distributions >> directly hurt poor people because there is a finite amount of >> wealth for everyone to share, and giving a unit of wealth to one >> person is equivalent to taking it away from someone else. Thus, >> the Daddy Model of Wealth is not totally broken. Wealth is not >> money, but many types of wealth *are* constrained by natural limits. >> >> A society's wealth can grow over time, but it will never be >> infinite. Thus, there will never be enough wealth to maximize >> everyone's utility. But given diminishing utility returns on >> wealth accumulation, sound public policy should ensure that wealth >> imbalances do not grow too large. >> >> ~j >> > > -- > http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" > > "Everything that can be invented has been invented." > -- Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents, 1899. > > >