X-Spam-Status: No -- Hits: -2.599 Required: 5 X-Spam-Summary: BAYES_00 Sender: -2.599 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from smtp.eecs.umich.edu (smtp.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.43]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0EG2ohe022535 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:02:50 -0500 Received: from idoldancer.mr.itd.umich.edu (idoldancer.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.14.76]) by smtp.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0E1TTmJ001930; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:29:29 -0500 Received: FROM boston.eecs.umich.edu (boston.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.61]) BY idoldancer.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 41E71EE6.72985.10575 ; 13 Jan 2005 20:22:46 -0500 Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0E1Mjhe002892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:22:45 -0500 Received: from localhost (dreeves Æ localhost) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id j0E1MjUZ002889; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:22:45 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: boston.eecs.umich.edu: dreeves owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: dreeves Æ boston.eecs.umich.edu In-Reply-To: <41E07D70.5010300 Æ eecs.umich.edu> Message-ID: References: <41E07D70.5010300 Æ eecs.umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 141.213.4.43 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:22:44 -0500 (EST) To: Matthew Rudary cc: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Daniel Reeves Subject: Re: Opposition vs. enemy, evangelical vs. radical and hateful Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 76 Thanks, I agree, and this article has chilled me out a little. Kapoo has been making that argument to me for some time. My counterargument has been (as I work myself back into my usual de-chilled state): sure, most christians aren't that extreme but only because they lack the conviction to take it to its logical conclusion. And there are some dangerous fundamentalist attitudes that do border on mainstream. Like the example discussed in the Bill Moyers article that Bethany sent a while ago (excerpt below). A member of Reagan's cabinet (!) actually espoused the view that environmental concerns should be deprioritized since the Second Coming is imminent. I call that a fundamentally unhealthy belief system. [addendum: the Huffington article that Andrew just sent has more hard evidence that an enormous minority of Americans have some kind of "end time philosophy".] Bill Moyers article excerpt: For the first time in our history, ideology and theology hold a monopoly of power in Washington. Theology asserts propositions that cannot be proven true; ideologues hold stoutly to a world view despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality. When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind. And there is the danger: voters and politicians alike, oblivious to the facts. Remember James Watt, President Reagan's first secretary of the Interior? My favorite online environmental journal, the ever-engaging Grist, reminded us recently of how James Watt told the U.S. Congress that protecting natural resources was unimportant in light of the imminent return of Jesus Christ. In public testimony he said, "after the last tree is felled, Christ will come back." Beltway elites snickered. The press corps didn't know what he was talking about. But James Watt was serious. So were his compatriots out across the country. They are the people who believe the bible is literally true -- one-third of the American electorate, if a recent Gallup poll is accurate. In this past election several million good and decent citizens went to the polls believing in the rapture index. That's right -- the rapture index. --- \/ FROM Matthew Rudary AT 05.01.08 19:40 (Yesterday) \/ --- > Eric Burns of websnark.com posted "The Twelfth Commandment" to which I > add the subitle "Know Your Opposition." He makes some good points about > not lumping Christianity (or even Fundamentalist or Evangelical > Christianity) in with people like WBC (creators of God Hates Fags): > > http://www.websnark.com/archives/2005/01/the_twelfth_com.html > > Matt -- http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - google://"Daniel Reeves"