X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=no 	version=3.2.0
Sender: 0.0 (spamval) -- NONE
Return-Path: <improvetheworld-errors &AElig umich.edu>
Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l63L6EcI015327 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) 	for <dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:06:14 -0400
Received: from tadpole.mr.itd.umich.edu (mx.umich.edu [141.211.14.133]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l63L620m027518; 	Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:06:02 -0400
Received: FROM py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) 	BY tadpole.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 468ABA2D.8820B.13015 ;  	 3 Jul 2007 17:05:49 -0400
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a25so3705166pyi         for <improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu>; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;         d=gmail.com; s=beta;         h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-mailer;         b=Xbv8GAmCnnVgpY6Wr/GUsmmMswMLYIrbOCmtGsqMJuaPFT8lELzbx9O3D1C0jRww3oXU6DRyO91Wcjf8msgGAvU1l9lxV4L1pFoOs7YE3ohnYFHgRscgagXLtxUY1XNR5uvLd0eTB9Li+o3U3NEDYBPZVDKuDIn0SCfWxEv+TXM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;         d=gmail.com; s=beta;         h=received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-mailer;         b=Q37zUg1K2bohTDdA3ndJyNzzCO/LMMIbLf/upSNSkhq4CsKHnVeq0cBb7ed+3Xk1BJCyiBl5IarXK1I7fF5XRZYr98/098fY6qfGLE3Rjhtq2J6S/qn+8v1LaSAbsev2BmcH+2l3vY4QDrR+MuBCX3LUmkKo9KVznJKaxIaYpcQ=
Received: by 10.35.75.15 with SMTP id c15mr8491328pyl.1183496747381;         Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?129.79.194.199? ( [129.79.194.199])         by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f79sm15707233pyh.2007.07.03.14.05.46         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);         Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <8288DFC1-138C-4AF7-AA50-F2C1E6117D3B &AElig gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on 	newman.eecs.umich.edu
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.3/3574/Mon Jul  2 04:07:06 2007 on newman.eecs.umich.edu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:06:54 -0400
To: improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu
From: Robert Felty <robfelty &AElig gmail.com>
Subject: several clever and funny pranks to flout security
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 1000

Getting back confiscated materials at the airport
http://www.zug.com/gab/index.cgi?func=view_thread&head=1&thread_id=74827

Secret message at the superbowl
http://www.zug.com/pranks/super/

Smuggling a vibrator onto a plane
http://www.zug.com/gab/index.cgi?func=view_thread&thread_id=68619

And also an article discussing how federal law does not require you  
to show photo ID at airports
http://www.thetraveljunkie.ca/articles.php?articleid=146

I highly agree with some of the comments on zug.com, namely that life  
involves risk, and we are wasting our time and money trying to make  
the country 100% secure. If it were measurable, I would venture to  
say that the cost of becoming 1% more sure probably grows  
exponentially, so that an effort to be 80% secure would not be too  
expensive, but as one tries to approach 100% the cost sky rockets,  
and civil liberties are ruined.

Rob

-- 
Robert Felty http://robfelty.com

	     If you must choose between two evils, pick the
one you've never tried before.