X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=3.2.0-r431796 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- lisashoe Æ gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l2A6OGGc013256 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:24:17 -0500 Received: from dave.mr.itd.umich.edu (mx.umich.edu [141.211.14.131]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2A6OCub032463; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:24:12 -0500 Received: FROM nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) BY dave.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 45F24EF0.45F55.26225 ; 10 Mar 2007 01:23:44 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n15so1359755nfc for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:23:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=t2esXHVZ/7mIXVIgh2/rVghFK9TL8GfB+98zAH8SCBqSOguueqMUPAjh3U4RjYWgCkyp7DHk2bRjlEHPcHUm+KCD1gnu5o5F3zcLROxF9COoOb+g6Qmm2vbAvkr/G0yJoL0Dl54w1g19Heb0BehHvD/Ywz8kuWOBeaksM1MWjLM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=NUNP8ZVuPOMN70Lklmu2aY363TbbtW4lRHuHXwxa2J9m7t4oLpupFeOIpaBJIYM8q9xnk6xNj3QtuHHtLi+Sr2YP6Lo2thoTycZlmf90k1fLMnUEOtekH2HoxYRZDg8eFQdyqWendz3JpV4UDfpcW2gOm/cMjjdKvdDXKnvZw1k= Received: by 10.78.195.9 with SMTP id s9mr328825huf.1173507823527; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:23:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.184.14 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 22:23:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8d3580670703092223j16385c80kdbd1e2f60ea4c56a Æ mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5045_8217923.1173507823484" References: <3a58138836fc8b56dde2b1c8ffff4b00 Æ umich.edu> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8e5f838324422c1e X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r431796 (2006-08-16) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:23:43 -0500 To: "Ashley S Bangert" Cc: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: "Lisa Hsu" Subject: Re: Grandpa Andrew's Reflections on Marriage Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 954 ------=_Part_5045_8217923.1173507823484 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I think your links are missing? Lisa On 3/9/07, Ashley S Bangert wrote: > > I thought that some of you might be interested in what the Society for > Neuroscience has to say about love and the Brain. Check out the following > website and note the cited journal articles at the bottom of the page. > > Ashley S. Bangert > Ph.D. Candidate > Department of Psychology > 530 Church St. > Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043 > Office: 4441 East Hall > Office Phone: (734) 763-1532 > email: abangert Æ umich.edu > > > On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Dave Morris wrote: > > > I believe, and think that I have seen, that many people feel love very > > differently, and that it can work quite differently for different > people, > > both in what is required to maintain it, and in whether they can feel it > for > > more than one person at a time. Quite a few problems in relationships > arise > > because of this fact, because one partner may assume that love works the > same > > way for their counterpart as for themselves, and thus misinterpret their > > actions- mistrust their emotions. > > > > Recent studies are beginning to detect what scientists believe are > > electromagnetic signs of that "in love" feeling in the brain, which is > > apparently differentiable from lust and other emotions. But this is just > > beginning, it will be some time before they can draw general conclusions > and > > explore the full range of possibility of human emotion. And there's a > > frightening though- what if your partner could put a hat on you and ask > you > > if you are "in love" with them and the computer would tell them whether > or > > not you're lying. Or maybe would that be a good thing? Hmmm. > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > On Mar 9, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Daniel Reeves wrote: > > > >>> the pysiological condition of being "in love" is only possible with > one > >>> person at a time. If you can't relate to what I'm talking about, then > >>> you've never really been in love. > >> > >> So judgmental! I think second guessing people's emotions is a bad > idea. > >> > >> -- > >> http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" > >> > >> Irrationality is the square root of all evil. > >> > >> > >> > > David P. Morris, PhD > > Operations Manager and Senior Engineer > > ElectroDynamic Applications, Inc. > > morris Æ edapplications.com, (734)786-1434, fax: (734)786-3235 > > > > > > > > ------=_Part_5045_8217923.1173507823484 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I think your links are missing?

Lisa

On 3/9/07, Ashley S Bangert <abangert Æ umich.edu> wrote:

I thought that some of you might be interested in what the Society for
Neuroscience has to say about love and the Brain. Check out the following
website and note the cited journal articles at the bottom of the page.

Ashley S. Bangert
Ph.D. Candidate
Department of Psychology
530 Church St.
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043
Office: 4441 East Hall
Office Phone: (734) 763-1532
email: abangert Æ umich.edu

On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Dave Morris wrote:

> I believe, and think that I have seen, that many people feel love very
> differently, and that it can work quite differently for different people,
> both in what is required to maintain it, and in whether they can feel it for
> more than one person at a time. Quite a few problems in relationships arise
> because of this fact, because one partner may assume that love works the same
> way for their counterpart as for themselves, and thus misinterpret their
> actions- mistrust their emotions.
>
> Recent studies are beginning to detect what scientists believe are
> electromagnetic signs of that "in love" feeling in the brain, which is
> apparently differentiable from lust and other emotions. But this is just
> beginning, it will be some time before they can draw general conclusions and
> explore the full range of possibility of human emotion.    And there's a
> frightening though- what if your partner could put a hat on you and ask you
> if you are "in love" with them and the computer would tell them whether or
> not you're lying. Or maybe would that be a good thing? Hmmm.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> On Mar 9, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Daniel Reeves wrote:
>
>>> the pysiological condition of being "in love" is only possible with one
>>> person at a time. If you can't relate to what I'm talking about, then
>>> you've never really been in love.
>>
>> So judgmental!  I think second guessing people's emotions is a bad idea.
>>
>> --
>> http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves   - -  search://"Daniel Reeves"
>>
>> Irrationality is the square root of all evil.
>>
>>
>>
> David P. Morris, PhD
> Operations Manager and Senior Engineer
> ElectroDynamic Applications, Inc.
> morris Æ edapplications.com, (734)786-1434, fax: (734)786-3235
>
>
>
>

------=_Part_5045_8217923.1173507823484--