X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham  	version=3.2.0-r431796
Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE
Return-Path: <improvetheworld-errors &AElig umich.edu>
Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id kA2I25nw018833 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) 	for <dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:02:06 -0500
Received: from jeffrey.mr.itd.umich.edu (mx.umich.edu [141.211.14.132]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA2I209X008559; 	Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:02:00 -0500
Received: FROM gordion.cs.bilkent.edu.tr (gordion.cs.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.21.213]) 	BY jeffrey.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 454A3291.22A5B.7716 ;  	 2 Nov 2006 13:01:53 -0500
Received: from assos (assos [139.179.21.100]) 	by gordion.cs.bilkent.edu.tr (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kA2I1pSv005068 	for <improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu>; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:01:51 +0200 (EET)
X-X-Sender: saranli &AElig assos
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611021201300.6877 &AElig columbus.eecs.umich.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0611021955190.3528 &AElig assos>
References: <3F4D88A7-A906-4379-9408-7B08456393B8 &AElig umich.edu>    <2ff07e720611011905s67212efbp3235bb19f5530ab4 &AElig mail.gmail.com>    <2ff07e720611020626j1369fef8h1fb1b0f64017b195 &AElig mail.gmail.com>  <8d3580670611020703wc597196id5049d2775bc100f &AElig mail.gmail.com>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611021005110.8847 &AElig kepler.eecs.umich.edu>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611021201300.6877 &AElig columbus.eecs.umich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r431796 (2006-08-16) on  	newman.eecs.umich.edu
X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:00:54 +0200 (EET)
To: improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu
From: Uluc Saranli <saranli &AElig cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Subject: Re: more user-friendly archives
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                 
X-UID: 836


On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Nate Clark wrote:

>
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Kevin Lochner wrote:
>
>> we can just have a rule that no one links to the board from any of their 
>> web-pages, then it's not reachable by google or whoever.
>> 
>
> This never works. The fact that many of you recieve this email via gmail 
> addresses means the archive has likely already been indexed.

Yes, and because of this fact, the last "private" link Dan sent is no 
longer private either. One of the reasons I prefer to keep my email on my 
office machine rather than google's servers.

I guess to be really safe, we should use encryption as well, but I, for 
one, am too lazy for that.


- Uluc.