X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.0-r431796 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k9C1Clnw000616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:12:47 -0400 Received: from tadpole.mr.itd.umich.edu (tadpole.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.14.72]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9C1CjHH019792; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:12:45 -0400 Received: FROM newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) BY tadpole.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 452D968A.822E3.4725 ; 11 Oct 2006 21:12:42 -0400 Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (boston.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.61]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9C1CeFs019776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:12:40 -0400 Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k9C1Cenw000612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:12:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (dreeves Æ localhost) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id k9C1Cdxd000609 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:12:39 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: boston.eecs.umich.edu: dreeves owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: dreeves Æ boston.eecs.umich.edu In-Reply-To: <5ed707a10610111741q5f18ab70g866d66d29949c31a Æ mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <16A13BB5-D1C6-4D82-85DA-ECC1482A9DDF Æ mac.com> <2ff07e720610111543q12b268fcx231c1ca3647af40f Æ mail.gmail.com> <0F2DC08C-EE88-4E78-881A-7A4F561CDB1A Æ umich.edu> <5ed707a10610111741q5f18ab70g866d66d29949c31a Æ mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r431796 (2006-08-16) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:12:39 -0400 (EDT) To: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Daniel Reeves Subject: Re: food poll - reply with a single number Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 789 Sorry, that was ambiguous. I meant, *don't* reply-to-all but I still won't take a private reply to mean keep your answer private, unless you specifically say so. Raw results so far are on the whiteboard. Edit if desired. http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves/improvetheworld (As I've often said though, it's no big deal to reply-to-all as long as you don't change the subject line since people can just ignore the whole thread. In fact, what the heck, reply-to-all after all. It will activate people's herd instincts and we'll get more data. :) --- \/ FROM bethany soule AT 06.10.11 20:41 (Today) \/ --- > .6 > > On 10/11/06, Daniel Reeves wrote: >> 14 responses so far... Keep 'em coming. >> I'll compile the statistics -- interesting distribution of answers. >> >> No need to reply-to-all. If you *don't* want your answer revealed >> publicly though, let me know, else I'll assume you don't mind. >> >> >> >> --- \/ FROM Robert Felty AT 06.10.11 18:55 (Today) \/ --- >> >> > .1 >> > On Oct 11, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Clare Dibble wrote: >> > >> >> 0.99 >> >> >> >> On 10/11/06, Joshua J Estelle wrote: >> >>> >> >>> 0.35 >> >>> -- >> >>> Joshua J Estelle >> >>> http://www.joshestelle.com >> >>> josh Æ joshestelle.com >> >>> jestelle Æ mac.com >> >>> (734) 945-6331 >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Oct 11, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Daniel Reeves wrote: >> >>> >> >>> (Iff you want to explain your answer, first reply with a single number, >> >>> then reply again with number + explanation.) >> >>> >> >>> If you had to assign yourself a number from 0 to 2 with 0 for strict >> >>> vegan, 1/2 for vegetarian, 1 for pure omnivore, and 2 if you >> >>> religiously avoid fruits and vegetables, what number describes you? >> >>> >> >>> If you seek out meat for most meals, put yourself at least a little >> >>> above 1. >> >>> >> >>> I'll go with 0.7. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" >> >>> >> >>> If you're a young Mafia gangster out on your first date, I >> >>> bet it's really embarrassing if someone tries to kill you. >> >>> -- Jack Handey >> >>> >> >>> >> > >> >> -- >> http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" >> >> Anthropologist: What's the most important thing to get >> right when you do a rain dance? >> Indian Chief: Timing. >> -- submitted by Terence Kelly, 2003-04-16 >> >> > -- http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves" "Why not a soft little ducky that baked cookies for your sins?" - A suggested alternative to Christianity by Cyndy Hammond