X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS  	autolearn=ham version=3.2.0-r431796
Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE
Return-Path: <improvetheworld-errors &AElig umich.edu>
Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k8LIcQnw025293 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) 	for <dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:38:26 -0400
Received: from ghostbusters.mr.itd.umich.edu (ghostbusters.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.93.144]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8LIcMPj014242; 	Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:38:22 -0400
Received: FROM newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) 	BY ghostbusters.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 4512DC1B.22DE6.13610 ;  	21 Sep 2006 14:38:19 -0400
Received: from kepler.eecs.umich.edu (kepler.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.81]) 	by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8LIcFYv014155 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); 	Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:38:15 -0400
Received: from kepler.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) 	by kepler.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k8LIc3wq010337; 	Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:38:03 -0400
Received: from localhost (klochner &AElig localhost) 	by kepler.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id k8LIc2h1010330; 	Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:38:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4512CED3.6050509 &AElig eecs.umich.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609211436330.9798 &AElig kepler.eecs.umich.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609180024050.23183 &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>  <4512CED3.6050509 &AElig eecs.umich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r431796 (2006-08-16) on  	newman.eecs.umich.edu
X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS
X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:38:02 -0400 (EDT)
To: Matt Rudary <mrudary &AElig eecs.umich.edu>
cc: improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu
From: Kevin Lochner <klochner &AElig eecs.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: water bottles on a plane
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 740

assuming that they caught it (otherwise what's the point of telling 
the story) and knowing dan . . . security caught him, he protested the 
ridiculousness of the ban, and they let him bring the bottle through.

Either that, or he was brought into interrogation of some sort (matt's (c))

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Matt Rudary wrote:

> A. Nothing happened.
> B. The security folks caught you and laughed.
> C. The security folks caught you, and you got arrested for being a smartass.
>
> I'm guessing A, because if it were C I don't think I'd have heard about it 
> this way and B seems unlikely because airport security doesn't seem to have a 
> sense of humor.
>
> Daniel Reeves wrote:
>> Just to see how far I could push it (last trip a camelbak -- triathlon 
>> style hydration thing -- full of water made it through) I tried a bottle of 
>> gatorade in my shorts, big enough that it looked like I was limping (though 
>> I did my best to conceal it).
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> Go ahead, place your bets as to what happened.  I won't tell you until I 
>> get a sufficient number of replies.
>> 
>