X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.2.0-r372567 Sender: -0.3 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k5U74X6V019631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:04:33 -0400 Received: from ghostbusters.mr.itd.umich.edu (ghostbusters.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.93.144]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5U74VUc018739 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:04:31 -0400 Received: FROM web81611.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81611.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.163]) BY ghostbusters.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 44A4CCFE.B16D6.23991 ; 30 Jun 2006 03:04:30 -0400 Received: (qmail 35818 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Jun 2006 07:04:30 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yVU8tx9YdvkFt4ooqpcSzgiYQE1r70a44GxggPCpVEmUTo4cXjRk4ry4h+zQrWQemxMLFdwNYLGarBzEiuELE4mX58aIcBRZ1V+EBAjFjsXjrF+zIBtq9hsHvQT8kYri3WSUHIVFoZCjm0sAv+Jt69P0NCxpw1Y2shTQnIrqXN0= ; Message-ID: <20060630070430.35816.qmail Æ web81611.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.122.238.249] by web81611.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:04:30 PDT Reply-To: Melanie Reeves In-Reply-To: <80ab53ec0606292308r34fe674g37c7fe8e0ce35768 Æ mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1453934127-1151651070=:35565" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-r372567 (2006-01-26) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:04:30 -0700 (PDT) To: Monica Stephens , Lisa Hsu Cc: Daniel Reeves , improvetheworld Æ umich.edu, Michael Schwarz , David Pennock , Yiling Chen , Daniel Reeves , yootopia-discuss Æ yahoo-inc.com From: Melanie Reeves Subject: Re: Fairer Favors Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 543 --0-1453934127-1151651070=:35565 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good points, Monica! This is why it only makes sense to me for a family or= a couple or a close group of friends or a group of co-workers (as long as = you're sure none of them are rapists! :-)) to use the system. Does Bethany= have to go with the lowest bidder though? Can't she skip the "rapist's" o= ffer and pay more for better service just like we can choose not to shop at= Walmart? ----- Original Message ---- From: Monica Stephens To: Lisa Hsu Cc: Daniel Reeves ; improvetheworld Æ umich.edu; Michael S= chwarz ; David Pennock ; Yilin= g Chen ; Daniel Reeves ; yootop= ia-discuss Æ yahoo-inc.com Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:08:05 PM Subject: Re: Fairer Favors I only felt comfortable bidding on bethany's airport trip after I e-mailed = her first. I didn't want to force her (through underbidding everybody else= ) to make an economic decision she was not socially comfortable with, and I= think that's my largest qualm with using this system. =20 I don't see the value of all airport rides as the same. If I were looking = for a ride to the airport, and my partner bid an exorbitant amount of yootl= es (i.e. Danny's Y$2000) to fly here and drive me to the airport, I would w= ant to discourage others from underbidding him in the auction. There is a= value added from spending the 30 min. drive time with him. After all, if = I then owed Y$2000, and he had a 2000 yootle surplus, it would be in my bes= t interest to immediately start charging yootles for things I usually do (c= ooking, cleaning, dishes, backrubs, etc=E2=80=A6). I would probably make = up the difference in less than 30 days, but I'd certainly piss him off in t= he process. Not only would he have to fly to Michigan for 30 minutes of my= time, but he'd then have to deal with price gouging for a back rub at 1:30= am. =20 So, back to Bethany's trip to the airport. What if a rapist bid 1 yootle t= o drive her to the airport? It would be like the walmartization of the yoo= tle system--one could undercut everybody else, economically force her to bu= y their service, then provide a crappy service that hurts everybody in the = long-run.=20 =20 -Monica =20 On 6/29/06, Lisa Hsu wrote:=20 the thing that really sold me on the yootles idea is the anecdote danny had= in his faq from dave...that sometimes he and exes have been at odds over s= omething, and he "won" the argument when it really mattered much less to hi= m than her, whatever it was. i think there is always room for spontaneity/= generousity, but there are times where one of us wants something (pizza) an= d another wants something else (thai food) and we need some medium of arbit= ration...so i think it would be cool for my fiance and i to try yootles.=20 a concern though, that i didn't think of until i saw melanie's email and da= nny's email, is that then you might feel you get "owed" yootles for being g= enerous. like, if one day i just felt like making him his favorite food, a= nd he didn't act sufficiently grateful ;), then i'd feel like he should hav= e given me a bunch of yootles...hmmm...and eventually i might stop offering= spontaneous gestures...??=20 i'm just thinking out loud here. i used to be concise and eloquent, before i became a full time engineer in = college. somehow, james has managed to keep his linguistic gifts, lucky hi= m :). =20 lisa On 6/29/06, Daniel Reeves wrote:=20 I'm getting responses offline indicating mass misunderstanding of Bethany's yootles mechanism. I encourage you all to spam the group=20 (reply-all) since it's really no problem for people to just ignore/delete the whole thread (as long as you don't change the subject line).=20 The main question is "what good is a yootle?" The answer is, as=20 established by precedent, about a fiftieth of a ride to the airport. Yootles are not meant to be exchanged for money. Nonetheless, if you=20 acquire yootles you will, in a real sense, get positive utility out of them. In fact, I personally guarantee it. If you can't find anything else to do with them I will give you cash for them. Seriously, they're=20 very useful to me for things like influencing family decisions or getting= =20 out of doing the dishes. Or getting out of tasks my boss assigns (I kid you not -- ask him; he's cc'd). Which perhaps means I shouldn't be=20 allowed to buy yootles -- that question is still under debate. The whole= =20 yootles thing is still brand new. It would be great to get input from you all. The other question about Bethany's airport auction people are asking is,=20 why are people who aren't even in Michigan bidding thousands of yootles?=20 Yes, it would be very dumb for me to fly to Detroit to take Bethany to the airport to fly to New York to visit me. But my bid just reflects that if= =20 for some crazy hypothetical reason she needed one of us to drive her at=20 any cost, that's roughly what the cost to me would be. The auction mechanism now uses that information to decide that, yes, it would be dumb= =20 for Danny to do it! And, as you can see, I'm fortunately losing the=20 auction. One anonymous person (ok, fine, my grandfather) has opined that this is an awful idea and that people should arrange exchanges of favors with no=20 explicit tracking system. The yootles system, he says, undermines the=20 spirit of magnanimity in favor-giving and fairness in decision-making and is bad for society. How's that for a gauntlet throwdown? Let's hear some side-taking...=20 Danny --- \/ FROM Daniel Reeves AT 06.06.29 12:13 (Today) \/ --- > Oh, wow, airport rides are a great example. I've more than once wished I > could respond along these lines: > "I could but it's at a bad time. But I'd rather take you than leave=20 > you high and dry. So, um, could I just pay for your cab?" > But of course that's not an option. > > So, yes, we're making far from socially optimal decisions about rides to = the > airport. Bethany's idea to auction off the favor is a really good one!= =20 > > If you could humor us and put in a bid even if you can't realistically do= it, > that would really help get a feel for how this system might work. > Like I put in Y$2000 estimating that's how much it would cost to get a la= st=20 > minute flight to detroit, rent a car, and drive Bethany to the airport. > > Ooh, and let me sweeten the deal: if you take Bethany to the airport you= can > use her car while she's gone. It's technically still my car, so I can sa= y=20 > that. :) > > Danny > > --- \/ FROM bethany soule AT 06.06.29 08:35 (Today) \/ --- > >> Inasmuch as fairer favor tracking and better group decision making >> improve the world, I'd like to open this up for discussion: Can=20 >> people make better decisions when they can explicitly compare their >> utilities for the different options? >> >> Or, more specifically, can I identify from among my friends, who would= =20 >> least mind taking me to the airport tomorrow? Let's find out: >> >> http://www.editgrid.com/user/bsoule/taxi-cab >> Or the view-only version since the above is browser-picky:=20 >> http://www.editgrid.com/user/bsoule/taxi-cab.html >> >> (Getting 50 yootles should be plenty to get your own ride to the >> airport from me or others later. More at yootles.com.) >>=20 >> Bethany >> > > -- http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - search://"Daniel Reeves"=20 "Life may have no meaning -- or even worse, it may have a meaning of which I disapprove." --0-1453934127-1151651070=:35565 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Good points, Monica!  This is why it only mak= es sense to me for a family or a couple or a close group of friends or a gr= oup of co-workers (as long as you're sure none of them are rapists! :-)) to= use the system.  Does Bethany have to go with the lowest bidder thoug= h?  Can't she skip the "rapist's" offer and pay more for better servic= e just like we can choose not to shop at Walmart?

----- Original Message ----
From: Monica Stephens <mstephen= s Æ gmail.com>
To: Lisa Hsu <hsul Æ eecs.umich.edu>
Cc: Daniel R= eeves <dreeves Æ umich.edu>; improvetheworld Æ umich.edu; Michael Schwarz= <schwarz.m Æ gmail.com>; David Pennock <pennockd Æ yahoo-inc.com>;= Yiling Chen <cheny Æ yahoo-inc.com>; Daniel Reeves <dreeves Æ yahoo-i= nc.com>; yootopia-discuss Æ yahoo-inc.com
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006= 11:08:05 PM
Subject: Re: Fairer Favors

I only felt comfortable bidding on be= thany's airport trip after I e-mailed her first.  I didn't want to for= ce her (through underbidding everybody else) to make an economic = decision she was not socially comfortable with, and I think that's my large= st qualm with using this system. 

I don't see = the value of all airport rides as the same.  = If I were looking for a ride to the airport, and my partner bid an exorbita= nt amount of yootles (i.e. Danny's Y$2000) to fly here and drive me to the = airport, I would want to discourage others from underbidding him in the auc= tion.   There is a value added from spending the 30 min. = drive time with him.  After all, if I then owed Y$2000, a= nd he had a 2000 yootle surplus, it would be in my best interest to immedia= tely start charging yootles for things I usually do (cooking, cleaning, dis= hes, backrubs, etc=E2=80=A6).   I would probably make up = the difference in less than 30 days, but I'd certainly piss him off in the = process.  Not only would he have to fly to Michigan for 3= 0 minutes of my time, but he'd then have to deal with price gouging for a back rub at 1:30 am.

 

So, back to Bethany's trip to the airport.  = What if a rapist bid 1 yootle to drive her to the airport?  It would b= e like the walmartization of the yootle system--one could undercut everybod= y else, economically force her to buy their service, then provide a crappy = service that hurts everybody in the long-run.
 
-Monica


 
On 6/29/06, Lisa= Hsu <hsul Æ eecs.umich.edu> wrote:=20
the thing that really sold me on the yootles idea is the anecdote dann= y had in his faq from dave...that sometimes he and exes have been at odds o= ver something, and he "won" the argument when it really mattered much less = to him than her, whatever it was.  i think there is always room for sp= ontaneity/generousity, but there are times where one of us wants something = (pizza) and another wants something else (thai food) and we need some mediu= m of arbitration...so i think it would be cool for my fiance and i to try y= ootles.

a concern though, that i didn't think of until i saw melani= e's email and danny's email, is that then you might feel you get "owed" yoo= tles for being generous.  like, if one day i just felt like making him= his favorite food, and he didn't act sufficiently grateful ;), then i'd fe= el like he should have given me a bunch of yootles...hmmm...and eventually = i might stop offering spontaneous gestures...??

i'm just thinking o= ut loud here.

i used to be concise and eloquent, before i became a full tim= e engineer in college.  somehow, james has managed to keep his linguis= tic gifts, lucky him :).
 

lisa


On 6/29/06, Dani= el Reeves <dreeves Æ umich.edu > wrote:=20
I'm getting responses = offline indicating mass misunderstanding of
Bethany's yootles mechanism.=   I encourage you all to spam the group
(reply-all) since it'= s really no problem for people to just ignore/delete
the whole thread (a= s long as you don't change the subject line).

The main question is = "what good is a yootle?"  The answer is, as
established by pr= ecedent, about a fiftieth of a ride to the airport.
Yootles are not mean= t to be exchanged for money.  Nonetheless, if you
acquire yoo= tles you will, in a real sense, get positive utility out of
them. &= nbsp;In fact, I personally guarantee it.  If you can't find anyth= ing
else to do with them I will give you cash for them.  Serio= usly, they're
very useful to me for things like influencing family deci= sions or getting
out of doing the dishes.  Or getting out of tasks my boss as= signs (I kid
you not -- ask him; he's cc'd).  Which perhaps me= ans I shouldn't be
allowed to buy yootles -- that question is still und= er debate.  The whole
yootles thing is still brand new. =  It would be great to get input from you
all.

The other ques= tion about Bethany's airport auction people are asking is,
why are peop= le who aren't even in Michigan bidding thousands of yootles?
Yes, it wo= uld be very dumb for me to fly to Detroit to take Bethany to the
airport= to fly to New York to visit me.  But my bid just reflects that i= f
for some crazy hypothetical reason she needed one of us to drive her = at
any cost, that's roughly what the cost to me would be.  Th= e auction
mechanism now uses that information to decide that, yes, it wo= uld be dumb
for Danny to do it!  And, as you can see, I'm for= tunately losing the
auction.

One anonymous person (ok, fine, my grandfat= her) has opined that this is an
awful idea and that people should arrang= e exchanges of favors with no
explicit tracking system.  The = yootles system, he says, undermines the
spirit of magnanimity in favor-= giving and fairness in decision-making and
is bad for society.

Ho= w's that for a gauntlet throwdown?  Let's hear some side-taking..= .

Danny

--- \/   FROM Daniel Reeves AT 06.06.29 12= :13 (Today)   \/ ---

> Oh, wow, airport rides are a gre= at example.  I've more than once wished I
> could respond a= long these lines:
>  "I could but it's at a bad time. =  But I'd rather take you than leave
>   you high and = dry.  So, um, could I just pay for your cab?"
> But of cour= se that's not an option.
>
> So, yes, we're making far from soc= ially optimal decisions about rides to the
> airport.  Bethany's idea to= auction off the favor is a really good one!
>
> If you could = humor us and put in a bid even if you can't realistically do it,
> th= at would really help get a feel for how this system might work.
> Lik= e I put in Y$2000 estimating that's how much it would cost to get a last > minute flight to detroit, rent a car, and drive Bethany to the airpo= rt.
>
> Ooh, and let me sweeten the deal:  if you tak= e Bethany to the airport you can
> use her car while she's gone. = ; It's technically still my car, so I can say
> that. :)
>= ;
> Danny
>
> --- \/   FROM bethany soule AT 06= .06.29 08:35 (Today)   \/ ---
>
>> Inasmuch as fai= rer favor tracking and better group decision making
>> improve the= world, I'd like to open this up for discussion:  Can
>>= ; people make better decisions when they can explicitly compare their
>> utilit= ies for the different options?
>>
>> Or, more specificall= y, can I identify from among my friends, who would
>> least mind = taking me to the airport tomorrow?  Let's find out:
>>>> http://www.editgrid.com/user/bsoule/= taxi-cab
>>   Or the view-only version since the abo= ve is browser-picky:
>> http://w= ww.editgrid.com/user/bsoule/taxi-cab.html
>>
>> (Gett= ing 50 yootles should be plenty to get your own ride to the
>> air= port from me or others later.  More at yootles.com.)
>> =
>> Bethany
>>
>
>

--
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves   - - &nbs= p;search://"Daniel Reeves"

"Life may have no meaning -- or even wor= se, it may have a meaning of
which I disapprove."




--0-1453934127-1151651070=:35565--