X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jAIJbXS8014749 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:37:34 -0500 Received: from jeffrey.mr.itd.umich.edu (jeffrey.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.14.71]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAIJbWN5029419; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:37:32 -0500 Received: FROM smtp.eecs.umich.edu (smtp.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.43]) BY jeffrey.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 437E2D77.5F951.1807 ; 18 Nov 2005 14:37:27 -0500 Received: from [141.213.9.157] (mcentire.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.9.157]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAIJbMjG016920 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:37:26 -0500 Message-ID: <437E2D72.2080002 Æ eecs.umich.edu> Organization: University of Michigan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:37:22 -0500 To: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: anthony nicholson Subject: Re: improving google Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 332 As a first step, go to http://userscripts.org. This is a repository of customization scripts made to work with the "Greasemonkey" plugin for Firefox (http://greasemonkey.mozdev.org/). There are 108 that change how google works, and another 43 or so for google maps. Some of them are unbelievably useful. But then again they might be aware of all this stuff already. -anthony- Daniel Reeves wrote: > Google has improving the world explicitly in its mission statement which > is my rationalization for why I'm not just exploiting this list for my > own selfish purposes in writing this: > > Could you all help me brainstorm ideas for improving Google, to prepare > for my interview with them on Monday, 6pm eastern? > > Thanks! > Danny > > ps, new rule: any off-topic email has to at least have an on-topic > postscript. (I was wracking my brain for such a postscript until I > realized that this itself qualifies!) And by the way, since it's easy > to delete a whole thread of email that you're not interested in, don't > worry too much about whether your reply is of fully general interest (as > long as you don't change the subject line). Do worry about that for > starting a new topic, of course, but even then, as long as your subject > line is descriptive, it's ok to target a small subset of the group. > (I'm just throwing general guidelines out there -- basically, keep doing > what you've been doing; it's working fine so far!) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:55:33 -0800 > To: dreeves Æ umich.edu > From: Louise > Subject: Google > > Hi Daniel > > Great speaking to you. > > I have scheduled you for a technical phone interview on 11/21 at 3pm PST. > Please let me know if you have conflicts. > > Some helpful tips in preparing for your phone interview: > > Consider ways that Google could improve. > > Consider the most difficult bug you've encountered/ fixed. > > Talk through your solutions, as this can help the interviewer to asses your > thought process and/ or approach > > Visit Google Labs http://labs.google.com/ > > Thanks and good luck. > > Louise > > Louise Gray Irwin > Recruiter > Google, Inc. > > 650-623-5177 > louise Æ google.com