X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HOT_NASTY, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 Sender: -2.4 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jA8JMPS8015794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:22:25 -0500 Received: from anniehall.mr.itd.umich.edu (anniehall.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.93.141]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA8JMOm0005483; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:22:24 -0500 Received: FROM newman.eecs.umich.edu (newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) BY anniehall.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 4370FAEB.A5D08.24762 ; 8 Nov 2005 14:22:19 -0500 Received: from brio.eecs.umich.edu (brio.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.52]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA8JMHpB005442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:22:18 -0500 Received: from brio.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) by brio.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA8JMH59022172 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:22:17 -0500 Received: from localhost (vfossum Æ localhost) by brio.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) with ESMTP id jA8JMHni022169 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:22:17 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:22:17 -0500 (EST) To: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Victoria Li Fossum Subject: from the front lines Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 310 A while ago, I asked a mutual friend to contact a woman I know who's the sole female analyst at a venture capital firm to discuss her experiences as a woman (both in undergrad/master's in accounting, and in the corporate world--she has worked at a software company, a consulting firm, and now a venture capital firm, all very high-powered companies). In case anyone is interested, I've enclosed her responses below. I just thought it might be interesting to have another perspective. In my understanding, venture capital remains sort of a male bastion within the (still largely male-dominated) finance industry, similar to computer architecture (Lisa's field) within the field of computer science, or organic chemistry/synthesis within the field of chemistry, or neurosurgery within the field of medicine, etc. My point being, this field is perhaps as male-dominated and/or chauvinistic as it gets. -Victoria > -> Do you think you ever feel overt anti-female discrimination in work? > > YES! Especially here at [venture capital firm]. Not so much at [software company] or even at [consulting firm]. > We're talking about drunk executives calling you up for a "drink" behind > your boss' back, comments re: womenly bio issues and the all-important > physicial features, an *ss slap with an annual report once, and just the > general miasma of "if you're too soft, you're incompetent; if you're too > hard you're a (I leave you to imagine the monikers)." The guys I work > with are good but the bankers and CEOs are terrible. > > -> Did you every feel it in school? Especially, for example, when you > were doing better than the guys in your class, which must have happened > often? > > To be fair, not so much but undergrad/Masters accounting is very girl > friendly = 50% ratio and the top students were evenly distributed b/w > girls and guys. I've been talking to female Phds who say that the gender > pressures are also significantly less in Acctg than say Finance or > Economics (evidence of sort of male bastions being established in > certain domains perhaps?). I do recall bad comments, avuncular profs who > patted your knee, etc. but then I thought that sort of thing couldn't > really hold me back. Now I understand, when promos are based are > relationships and even in school, when advisor mentorship is directed at > those who they see as younger versions of themselves, it's hard for > women to step out of a daughter/hot chick/whatever role and really earn > a boss' respect. > > I would understand if Vicki experiences it in a very guy-ish field and > I've noticed attitudes worsening the older we get. In high school, it > appeared that at least everyone played lip service or was open to the > idea that women are equal, that they can get everything they want, that > they can also date whoever whenever until however old they get, that > they can pursue careers, marriage, etc. Now, I find that people's > attitudes, both male and female, are solidifying into essentially what > their parents or peers think. Or maybe it's just that chauvinists > self-select themselves into the jobs/academic programs we apply for now. > I also think affirmative action has played a role to cause men to "look > twice" at a women's credentials before accepting that she really > "deserves" to be there. Finally, women in part do themselves in by > believing the hype - that they were hired to incl women in the faculty, > that their eggs are dying so quick, grab a husband and birth that baby > before it's too late (Prof Sylvia Hewitt, that crone!, wrote a HBR > article and book that sent women everywhere in a tizzy), that it's too > hard to get through the glass ceiling and wouldn't it be easier to marry > a nice, rich man instead? > > There's this website re: female Phd studies that's thoroughly depressing > if you're interested. > http://kerlins.net/bobbi/research/myresearch/hrsa.html > > And if you're more intrigued with the social drawbacks to being a woman, > read the New York Times Magazine two Sundays ago - Maureen Dowd provides > a retrospective on all the "women, your life sucks" articles ever, incl > a reference to a tome my mom would have loved telling women that men > love a girl who is like a "mysterious, soft cat". > > I don't know if I buy all of the negativity. I do think if you're clever > and willing to laugh at yourself enough, the average situation doesn't > apply to you, that you can still break the "rules" but the evidence is > discouraging to say the least. > > Sorry - I didn't mean to write a novel but you pressed a button. > Interested in feedback from you/Vicki. =)