| Message Number: | 209 |
| From: | Anthony Nicholson <tonynich Æ umich.edu> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:28:25 -0400 |
| Subject: | Re: NYTimes.com: Behind Gold's Glitter: Torn Lands and Pointed Questions |
Not a perfect solution, but for my girlfriend's engagement ring I bought an antique (so the damage has already been done, instead of encouraging demand for new mining of the diamond and the platinum in it). -anthony > > On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Daniel Reeves wrote: > > > > > Never buy anything gold. Check. > > > > > > --- \/ FROM mjste Æ umich.edu AT 05.10.25 08:46 (Today) \/ --- > > > > > > > This page was sent to you by: mjste Æ umich.edu. > > > > > > > > This article is fascinating. I would love your comments on this. Do > > you > > > > think that it is worth it? > > > > > > > > > > > > INTERNATIONAL | October 24, 2005 > > > > The Cost of Gold | 30 Tons an Ounce: Behind Gold's Glitter: Torn Lands > > > > and Pointed Questions > > > > By JANE PERLEZ and KIRK JOHNSON > > > > Much of the gold left to be mined is microscopic and is being wrung > > from > > > > the earth at enormous environmental cost. > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/24/international/24GOLD.html?emc=eta1 > > > > > > -- > > > http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - google://"Daniel Reeves" > > > > > > "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." > > > -- Wolfgang Pauli, on a paper submitted by a physicist colleague > > > > > >

