X-Spam-Status: No -- Hits: -1.665  Required: 5
X-Spam-Summary: BAYES_00
Sender: -1.665 (spamval) -- NONE
Return-Path: <improvetheworld-errors &AElig umich.edu>
Received: from smtp.eecs.umich.edu (smtp.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.43]) 	by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iAFKqCJc008741 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) 	for <dreeves &AElig boston.eecs.umich.edu>; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:52:13 -0500
Received: from oilandwater.mr.itd.umich.edu (oilandwater.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.93.145]) 	by smtp.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iAFKpecj014314; 	Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:51:50 -0500
Received: FROM struggle.mr.itd.umich.edu (struggle.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.14.79]) 	BY oilandwater.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 41991432.3D47F.31032 ;  	15 Nov 2004 15:40:18 -0500
Received: from [141.213.141.108] (wuser69-shapiro.umnet.umich.edu [141.213.141.108]) 	by struggle.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp) with ESMTP id iAFKdpZs020209; 	Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:39:51 -0500
Message-ID: <41991416.8080203 &AElig umich.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BAY13-F17u1B6gVs1tI000185a0 &AElig hotmail.com> <4198FBAD.8070500 &AElig umich.edu> <41990650.4070905 &AElig eecs.umich.edu>
In-Reply-To: <41990650.4070905 &AElig eecs.umich.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:39:50 -0500
To: Matthew Rudary <mrudary &AElig eecs.umich.edu>
CC: improvetheworld &AElig umich.edu
From: Andrew Skol <askol &AElig umich.edu>
Subject: Re: Bush's Cabinet resignations
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                 
X-UID: 19

Does anyone expect Rummy to go?  If anyone should be fired and not 
resign, I think it is he.  But then again this might send the message 
that a mistake (or dare we say, mistakes) was made in Iraq. And as 
George made quite clear during debate number 2, this is not the case.

Andrew

Matthew Rudary wrote:

> Yes, this is fairly common. The two links below list the cabinet 
> members under Reagan and Clinton. Clinton had 6 posts change in 1997, 
> and Reagan had 7 change in 1985, not to mention several changes in 
> other years under both presidents.
>
> http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0101271.html
> http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0101275.html
>
> Matt
>
> Fish wrote:
>
>> Erin Frey wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone heard about the Cabinet resignations? (ie. Colin Powell)  
>>> Bush said it was due to burnout, I wonder what is really going on?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Here's the NyTimes article:
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/15/politics/15cnd-cabi.html?ei=5094&en=e6d4c24b00751519&hp=&ex=1100581200&adxnnl=1&partner=homepage&adxnnlx=1100544873-2i0tPh9wO+HdhCd+XqVLKA 
>>
>>
>> What I don't know is how common this is.  Did Clinton's cabinet have 
>> similar turnover?  Reagan's?
>>
>> B-
>>
>
>