X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX18h77V5EjfQRr0QubdSooI22luiJ6rdxqI Æ newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3L3xglj003282 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:59:42 -0400 Received: from brokenways.mr.itd.umich.edu (brokenways.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.93.142]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3L3pLII008436; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:51:21 -0400 Received: FROM boston.eecs.umich.edu (boston.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.61]) BY brokenways.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 42672527.7E359.8566 ; 20 Apr 2005 23:59:35 -0400 Received: from boston.eecs.umich.edu (localhost.eecs.umich.edu [127.0.0.1]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3L3xYlj003278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:59:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (dreeves Æ localhost) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id j3L3xYtR003275; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:59:34 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: boston.eecs.umich.edu: dreeves owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: dreeves Æ boston.eecs.umich.edu In-Reply-To: <42672189.261582EC Æ wayne.edu> Message-ID: References: <42672189.261582EC Æ wayne.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:59:34 -0400 (EDT) To: Andrew Reeves cc: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Daniel Reeves Subject: Re: catholicism must be crushed Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 146 wow, sent my last email before I saw this. This is an absolutely delightful response. and yes, I retract that "must be crushed" part. (it was a Voltaire reference) --- \/ FROM Andrew Reeves AT 05.04.20 23:44 (Today) \/ --- > Danny: > I think your animosity is ill-advised; I certainly oppose very > strongly any attempt at "crushing" (whatever that means) because it > would only cause the "circling of the wagons" by the faithful. > Catholicism must be allowed to die peacefully, and it is my serious > opinion that you and your generation will live to see that happening if > you only leave it alone and let it expire by the weight of its own > internal absurdities and prevarications. The election of Ratzinger was > in my opinion an excellent step because it will only accelerate this > process. I was actually trembling that they might elect a "moderate" > Pope who would make concessions with the superficial problems such as > celibacy (closely associated with priestly pedophilia) exclusion of > females, and so forth which would keep the simpletons happy and thereby > add a few decades to the moribund agonies of the church. In the > meantime, of course, the core problems (tri-une God, Virgin Birth, > transubstantiation) would remain untouched. Seeing that this is not what > happened (and how promptly!) almost makes me believe in the Holy Spirit! > To answer your questions: All militant religions are equally evil; > Islam has in our time a slight edge because it blows up buildings which > Catholicism has outgrown. I don't begrudge any cleric to think that his > religion is the only true one and all the others are false; history > shows that the smaller the difference the hotter the fury. Remember the > "one iota" difference (homousion vs. homoiusion) between the Anathasians > and Arians at the Council of Nicea? 50,000 people were massacred in one > night which was quite a feat in the 4th century. Given the advances in > weaponry even Osama has a lot to learn. --Grandpa Andrew > > > > Daniel Reeves wrote: > > > > Seriously, is there a greater force of evil in the world than the > > catholic church? > > > > Couple blurbs from CNN about the new anti-gay, anti-feminist, > > anti-contraception, anti-catholicity pope: > > > > Ratzinger has said modernity led to a blurring of sexual identity, > > causing some feminists to become adversaries of men. He labeled > > homosexuality "an intrinsic moral evil." > > > > He argued that Muslim Turkey did not belong in Christian Europe and > > issued a document saying that Catholicism was the only true religion, > > questioning the validity of other religions, even Christian ones, even > > as his Pope John Paul II was trying to reach out to other faiths. > > > > -- > > http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - google://"Daniel Reeves" > -- http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/dreeves - - google://"Daniel Reeves" "There was a time when religion ruled the world. It is known as the Dark Ages." -- Ruth Hermence Green (Women Without Superstition)