X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 Sender: -2.6 (spamval) -- NONE Return-Path: Received: from newman.eecs.umich.edu (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX19ALwu3hnlSo0M+bLrsA7zVTgHeaYbssDM Æ newman.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.4.11]) by boston.eecs.umich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j2E3PPlj008208 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:25:25 -0500 Received: from informer.mr.itd.umich.edu (informer.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.14.72]) by newman.eecs.umich.edu (8.13.2/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2E3Lrmf009854; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:21:53 -0500 Received: FROM web52009.mail.yahoo.com (web52009.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.65]) BY informer.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 4235041E.3150E.27057 ; 13 Mar 2005 22:25:18 -0500 Received: (qmail 14276 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Mar 2005 03:25:17 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=mAwZ0kIQpwM+lyM+3tYgyVh1fLKf5BuxbNzKDvUZUk0pa/ygbeEvj6JdPBJnuzW9zt3u3OmH2cGUnydiO2klK2titRrcZyIKeIL1R4JPEz0+UnhqmKYJrtB77ncmffrX5jLTWQ5YINcyXWRk5jIjsSN43dWk2NyIKdKQSYFf1JU= ; Message-ID: <20050314032517.14274.qmail Æ web52009.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.40.202.117] by web52009.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:25:17 PST MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on newman.eecs.umich.edu X-Virus-Scan: : UVSCAN at UoM/EECS Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:25:17 -0800 (PST) To: improvetheworld Æ umich.edu From: Rob Subject: Fwd: Online Dating Legislation in Michigan Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 111 --- Liz Entwistle wrote: > Subject: Online Dating Legislation in Michigan > Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:52:45 -0600 > From: "Liz Entwistle" > To: "Liz Entwistle" > > > > Hi, I'm Liz, with Match.com public relations. I'm > writing to you because > based on your resignation data, you met someone on > Match.com. I'm > writing to ask your opinion of legislation, Bill > 0286 - regarding the > regulation of online dating - which is slated for > vote by the Michigan > State Senate before becoming law. Bill 0286 would > require the growing > number of dating Web sites, including Match.com, to > provide mandatory > background checks on every single customer OR the > site must prominently > disclose that it does not do background checks. This > raises the > question: Is it the government's place to make a > foray into a person's > private dating life? > > > > I'm interested in knowing where you stand on this > issue, as someone who > has used our service and found success. Are you in > support of or opposed > to it and why? Your feedback on this issue is very > important to us and > to the current Match.com members living in your > state. I'd love to hear > your opinions about this matter and encourage you to > write to me at > liz.entwistle Æ match.com > . > > > > Thank you, > > > > _______________________ > > > > Liz Entwistle > > Public Relations, Match.com > > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/